Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Scandals and media are two correlated entities. Media follows scandals to represent problems to mass people. Thus it became a part of our life. We find news regarding scandals from every sector of world. Scandals are problems that goes beyond control. It takes attention of people to the problem. While speaker and reformer can talk about morality. They can prepare us morally for the problems. Instead scandals show us effect of problems and help us face it practically and solve it.
“Panama Papers” scandal was one of the biggest in history. People from every profession in various country was involved in it. This scandal helped to rethink the legislature about stopping illegal activities. Lots of powerful and famous persons are still visiting court yard for the scandal. It showed the world no one is beyond the law. In future everyone will be careful and think before do anything illegal. Well, this scandal not only helped to readjust the law but also broke world peace, authority had hard time bring the world together. Many people in higher position has resigned from the post they were as a result of the scandal, thus created a chaos.
Scandal regarding governing body of FIFA is also related to this “Panama Papers” scandal. Names of many governing body was highlighted during “Panama Papers”. Their record just did not stop there, there’s proof of bribing regarding 2018 and 2022 FIFA world cup. This scandal shows necessity of transparency of FIFA. This helps to represent that no sector is free of illegal activities, not even one of most beloved sport. On the other hand, FIFA had to become orphan for the time being and it took time to get in shape, reelect the whole governing body in short time to keep control of the sport was hard and chaotic.
Scandal is like rain and flood. Rain and flood wash all the dirt off the things, rain refreshes the nature cool down the weather while hot. Rain also create a wet and muddy environment, and while there is flood there is also collateral damage. And that needs time to fix and start as new.
To conclude, scandal has its own way to fixing things, to get focus on the problems but it also has the damage to take care of. On the contrary, speaker and reformer just help us to build our moral, so that we don’t need to go through scandals. Both have their purpose to serve.
- Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in orderto thrive, because it is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved andgenerated. 50
- Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership. 78
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated. 50
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts. 83
- Scandals-whether in politics, academia, or other area-can be useful. They focus our attention onproblems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...s to represent problems to mass people. Thus it became a part of our life. We find n...
^^^^
Line 1, column 396, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...an prepare us morally for the problems. Instead scandals show us effect of problems and...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'regarding', 'so', 'still', 'thus', 'well', 'while', 'in short', 'as a result', 'on the contrary', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.26710816777 0.240241500013 111% => OK
Verbs: 0.185430463576 0.157235817809 118% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0662251655629 0.0880659088768 75% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0441501103753 0.0497285424764 89% => OK
Pronouns: 0.046357615894 0.0444667217837 104% => OK
Prepositions: 0.108167770419 0.12292977631 88% => OK
Participles: 0.0331125827815 0.0406280797675 82% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.34726035452 2.79330140395 84% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0397350993377 0.030933414821 128% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0794701986755 0.0997080785238 80% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00662251655629 0.0249443105267 27% => Some modal verbs wanted.
WH_determiners: 0.00220750551876 0.0148568991511 15% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2352.0 2732.02544248 86% => OK
No of words: 410.0 452.878318584 91% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73658536585 6.0361032391 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.58838876751 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.324390243902 0.366273622748 89% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.241463414634 0.280924506359 86% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.156097560976 0.200843997647 78% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0878048780488 0.132149295362 66% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34726035452 2.79330140395 84% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 219.290929204 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548780487805 0.48968727796 112% => OK
Word variations: 63.2782929225 55.4138127331 114% => OK
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6194690265 145% => OK
Sentence length: 13.6666666667 23.380412469 58% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7079918637 59.4972553346 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.4 141.124799967 56% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.6666666667 23.380412469 58% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.433333333333 0.674092028746 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 37.8130081301 51.4728631049 73% => OK
Elegance: 1.48 1.64882698954 90% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123007837203 0.391690518653 31% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0988184322846 0.123202303941 80% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0924193779573 0.077325440228 120% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.447578882344 0.547984918172 82% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.132823398837 0.149214159877 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0456175824166 0.161403998019 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497566804992 0.0892212321368 56% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.256389197015 0.385218514788 67% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0909251882526 0.0692045440612 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0832397482572 0.275328986314 30% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628254414179 0.0653680567796 96% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.4325221239 29% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 21.0 5.30420353982 396% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88274336283 123% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 7.22455752212 28% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 17.0 3.66592920354 464% => Less negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 22.0 13.5995575221 162% => OK
---------------------
It is not right on the topic in the view of e-grader.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.