Seven years ago, homeowners in nearby Brookville community adopted a set of restrictions on how the community's yards should be landscaped and what colors the exteriors of homes should be painted. Since then, average property values have tripled in Brookville. In order to raise property values in Deerhaven Acres, we should adopt our own set of restrictions on landscaping and housepainting.
In this letter, a committee of Deerhaven Acres homeowners recommends that to enhance of Deerhaven property values; owners should follow some restrictions concerning home’s exterior appearance. To prove that the recommendation, the Brookville community adopted similar restrictions and average property values have tripled in seven years. However, this proposal cannot be accepted as it is in that it rests on some premises all of which can be challenged in one way or another.
The first problem with the argument is that the committee assumes that increasing of Brookville property values because of home’s exterior appearance. However, there is no evidence to prove that raising of assets values happened because of some restrictions such as landscaping and painting of home’s exterior appearance. For instance, maybe ownership of value is a function of demand and supply. Perhaps the application for housing has increased due to an influx of major employers. Or, maybe the provision house has decreased. Either scenario would provide an alternative explanation for the increase in property values.
Another problem with the argument is that the committee assumes that the Brookville is identical to the Deerhaven Acres in all respects. However, there is no evidence to prove that this is the case. Maybe people in Brookville have better economic conditions than people in Deerhaven Acres. Alternatively, perhaps the personalities in two communities, their tastes and lifestyles are different from each other. For instance, people in Deerhaven Acres do not like to change their home’s exterior appearance.
A third problem with the argument is that the committee assumes that things remain same all over the years. However, in most cases, this is not true. Maybe seven years ago people are not more open and liberal and like unified community yards and colors. However, now people pay more attention to the home’s insides and facilities than exterior appearance.
In the final analysis, the committee’s recommendation cannot be taken to be correct, as it was shown in the body paragraphs above. It depends on some assumptions each of which is questionable. The recommendation can only be accepted if the weaknesses already referred to are all removed.
- For the past five years, Mr. Charles Schade has been the music director at Steel City High School, and during that time the school band from Steel City High has won three regional band competitions. In addition, the quality of the music rehearsal faciliti 35
- "For the past five years, Mr. Charles Schade has been the music director at Steel City High School, and during that time the school band from Steel City High has won three regional band competitions. In addition, the quality of the music rehearsal facilit 35
- For the past five years Mr Charles Schade has been the music director at Steel City High School and during that time the school band from Steel City High has won three regional band competitions In addition the quality of the music rehearsal facilities an 35
- Seven years ago, homeowners in nearby Brookville community adopted a set of restrictions on how the community's yards should be landscaped and what colors the exteriors of homes should be painted. Since then, average property values have tripled in Brookv 66
- even years ago, homeowners in nearby Brookville community adopted a set of restrictions on how the community's yards should be landscaped and what colors the exteriors of homes should be painted. Since then, average property values have tripled in Brookvi 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n be challenged in one way or another. The first problem with the argument is t...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n for the increase in property values. Another problem with the argument is tha...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...their home's exterior appearance. A third problem with the argument is tha...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'third', 'for instance', 'such as', 'in most cases']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.266826923077 0.25644967241 104% => OK
Verbs: 0.132211538462 0.15541462614 85% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0697115384615 0.0836205057962 83% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0528846153846 0.0520304965353 102% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0144230769231 0.0272364105082 53% => OK
Prepositions: 0.137019230769 0.125424944231 109% => OK
Participles: 0.03125 0.0416121511921 75% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.08227795114 2.79052419416 110% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0240384615385 0.026700313972 90% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.110576923077 0.113004496875 98% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0144230769231 0.0255425247493 56% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00480769230769 0.0127820249294 38% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2291.0 2731.13054187 84% => OK
No of words: 353.0 446.07635468 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.49008498584 6.12365571057 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.57801047555 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.43342776204 0.378187486979 115% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.354107648725 0.287650121315 123% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.271954674221 0.208842608468 130% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.178470254958 0.135150697306 132% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08227795114 2.79052419416 110% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 207.018472906 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481586402266 0.469332199767 103% => OK
Word variations: 49.977105044 52.1807786196 96% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.039408867 105% => OK
Sentence length: 16.8095238095 23.2022227129 72% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.164344924 57.7814097925 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.095238095 141.986410481 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8095238095 23.2022227129 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.428571428571 0.724660767414 59% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.58251231527 84% => OK
Readability: 52.220288682 51.9672348444 100% => OK
Elegance: 2.18072289157 1.8405768891 118% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376714609033 0.441005458295 85% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.107380142184 0.135418324435 79% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0963332213475 0.0829849096947 116% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.493604416368 0.58762219726 84% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.133843823079 0.147661913831 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132648223833 0.193483328276 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0814850516207 0.0970749176394 84% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.347029464292 0.42659136922 81% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0883886773349 0.0774707102158 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25096409809 0.312017818177 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0798820680568 0.0698173142475 114% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.33743842365 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 6.87684729064 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.82512315271 62% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 6.46551724138 93% => OK
Negative topic words: 8.0 5.36822660099 149% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.82389162562 71% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 14.657635468 109% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 66.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.