Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should write at least 250 words.
There is an ongoing controversy about whether the government should make the waste recycling a legal requirement for the residents. Someone disagrees with this idea, claiming that it should be people’s right to choose their own waste management. However, in my opinion, I think it’s better for the government to make it a law for several reasons.
First, with the law, it is easier to manage the waste from domestic use. These days, the residential areas are scatter all over the city, making it’s harder to get the management done effectively. For instance, in the past century, people in Thailand tended to live near the rivers, but now people can live anywhere because there are sufficient facilities, such as water and electricity, available. So the authorities, who are responsible for waste management, have to work at many areas, spending more time to deal with the problems. So, it would be easier for the government to impose the law about recycling the waste in order to reduce the authorities’ jobs that may cause by the complex urban area right now.
Second, resident’s recycling can create financial benefits to the country. Instead of investing on new waste incineration plants to serve the increasing waste from the increasing population, enforcing people to recycle their own trashes help the country save the costs. A report in Thailand claims that the volume of waste that need to be eliminate is now exceed the incineration’s capacity, leaving the wastes unclear and creating the pollution to the city. This problem won’t happen if the resident is responsible for their own wastes. Clearly, it’s better to make the recycling the law requirement.
In conclusion, there’re many advantages of imposing the law about waste recycling. It makes the government easier to manage the waste and it has financial benefit to do so. Therefore, I am strongly convinced that law requirement for recycling the waste is needed.
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made reading passage.In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications 66
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their wast 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 61
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.To what extent do your agree or disagree with this opinion?What sort of punishment should parents and 67
- In general, people are not as concerned as they were a decade ago about regulating their intake of red meat and fatty cheeses. Walk into the Heart's Delight, a store that started selling organic fruits and vegetables and whole-grain flours in the 1960's, 70
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'for instance', 'i think', 'in conclusion', 'such as', 'in my opinion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.233333333333 0.247107183377 94% => OK
Verbs: 0.166666666667 0.155533422707 107% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0794871794872 0.0946595960268 84% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0333333333333 0.0501214627716 67% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0384615384615 0.0437548338989 88% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0974358974359 0.122226691241 80% => OK
Participles: 0.0461538461538 0.0403226058552 114% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.05188703416 2.80594681477 109% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0435897435897 0.0326793684256 133% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.110256410256 0.0861772015684 128% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0153846153846 0.021408717616 72% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00769230769231 0.011925033212 65% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1982.0 1933.35771543 103% => OK
No of words: 317.0 316.048096192 100% => OK
Chars per words: 6.2523659306 6.12580529183 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20517956788 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.375394321767 0.374742101984 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.283911671924 0.28420135186 100% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.223974763407 0.203846283523 110% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.170347003155 0.137316102897 124% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05188703416 2.80594681477 109% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.037074148 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561514195584 0.56093040696 100% => OK
Word variations: 60.3000990986 60.7387585426 99% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0891783567 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.8125 20.7743622355 95% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2601853178 49.517814964 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.875 127.492653851 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8125 20.7743622355 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8125 0.814263465372 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.99599198397 0% => OK
Readability: 48.2036671924 49.1944974215 98% => OK
Elegance: 1.58064516129 1.69124875643 93% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.461767604659 0.332605444948 139% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.11191934842 0.102741220458 109% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0490391281138 0.0668466124924 73% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.60218552143 0.534860350844 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0901467670026 0.148594505496 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.215511425544 0.134430193775 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612025416241 0.0742795772207 82% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.536761642863 0.324371583561 165% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0556371814775 0.0638462369009 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.357540187818 0.228012699653 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256647149452 0.058150111329 44% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.68436873747 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.41683366733 59% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 5.90881763527 118% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 2.5751503006 233% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 1.9629258517 51% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 10.4468937876 134% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.