Explain how the new guidelines adopted in the United Kingdom helped to address the specific problems discussed in the reading passage.
The reading passage states that despite the fact that the United Kingdom has a great history; most of its valuable artifacts have been destroyed. However, the professor controverts all the main points that have been made by the author of the reading passage. She also discredits all the arguments by providing some rational reasons based on brand new guidelines.
First and foremost, the author asserts that the construction projects followed by the growth of Britain's population either destroyed most of the artifacts or hid them underneath the buildings. In contrast, the lecturer opposes with this issue due to the fact that ever since that new guidelines were prepared all the construction sites had to be examined by archaeologists in order to be determined whether they had an archaeological value or not. In this way, the government would have been able to preserve the artifacts by either allowing the constructors to construct their buildings around the site or documenting the site very well.
Furthermore, the reading holds the view that inasmuch as the government would have allocated low budget for archaeologists to do their researches, they were not motivated for archaeology projects. On the contrary, the speaker disputes that after applying the new guidelines, the construction companies had to pay for the initial examination, not the government, so archaeologists would have had a completely new support.
Eventually, the reading passage contends that back those days in the past, archaeologists had no career options; indeed, there were a few choices for them, and they had to chase another career not related to archaeology. However, the professor argues that via using the new guidelines so many job opportunities had been prepared for archaeologists, from examining the sites to processing the data collected.
In brief, the professor disagrees with the passage on the grounds of the aforementioned arguments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-15 | arizaturan | 3 | view |
| 2017-09-11 | ajulyav | 3 | view |
| 2017-09-11 | ajulyav | 3 | view |
| 2017-09-11 | ajulyav | 3 | view |
| 2016-08-03 | Vida Pashaei | 86 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social skills are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support. 70
- Whether hydrogen fuel-cell engines are better substitute for internal-combustion engines or not? 86
- Whether hydrogen fuel-cell engines are better substitute for internal-combustion engines or not? 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People benefit more from traveling in their own country than traveling to foreign countries. 86
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'well', 'in brief', 'in contrast', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.245508982036 0.261695866417 94% => OK
Verbs: 0.170658682635 0.158904122519 107% => OK
Adjectives: 0.062874251497 0.0723426182421 87% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0508982035928 0.0435111971325 117% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0269461077844 0.0277247811725 97% => OK
Prepositions: 0.125748502994 0.128828473217 98% => OK
Participles: 0.0658682634731 0.0370669169778 178% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.11355243974 2.5805825403 121% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0299401197605 0.0208969081088 143% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.155688622754 0.128158765124 121% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00898203592814 0.0158828679856 57% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0059880239521 0.0114777025283 52% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1943.0 1645.83664459 118% => OK
No of words: 304.0 271.125827815 112% => OK
Chars per words: 6.39144736842 6.08160592843 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.04852973271 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.368421052632 0.374372842146 98% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.322368421053 0.287516216867 112% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.256578947368 0.187439937562 137% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.1875 0.113142543107 166% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11355243974 2.5805825403 121% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 145.348785872 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549342105263 0.539623497131 102% => OK
Word variations: 57.3729123349 53.8517498576 107% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0529801325 84% => OK
Sentence length: 27.6363636364 21.7502111507 127% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.838416594 49.3711431718 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 176.636363636 132.220823453 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6363636364 21.7502111507 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.909090909091 0.878197800319 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 59.8732057416 50.5018328374 119% => OK
Elegance: 1.75903614458 1.90840788429 92% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.559496192329 0.549887131256 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.185870377163 0.142949733639 130% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0678319622542 0.0787303798458 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.7586049356 0.631733273073 120% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.122824876619 0.139662658121 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.323733944817 0.266732575781 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0821989787104 0.103435571967 79% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.479853545632 0.414875509568 116% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0842564823415 0.0530846634433 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.420781291041 0.40443939384 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322133818038 0.0528353158467 61% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.26048565121 23% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.49668874172 143% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.2958057395 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.