tpo10
The reading and the lecture are both about decreasing the number of sea otters along the western coast, which is two possible explanation. The author of the reading believes that environmental pollution is the most effective factor. The lecture casts doubt on the claims made in the article. She thinks pollution hypothesis is less likley than attacks by predators.
First of all, the author claims that in the western coast there were a lot of source for contamination such as oil rigs many industrial chemical pollution. He believs this pollution could affect the otters and suceptable them to diseases. This point is challenged by the lecture. She says that if the otters died by pollution, why there is not any dead body of them. Furthermore, she points out attacks by predators is more possible. Because in this condition, there is not any dead body.
Secondly, the author states that if predator is more likely, why other species were decreased too? This argument is rebutted by the lecture. She suggests that the number of wales is declined because human hunted them.
Finally, the author mentions that uneven pattarn of decline of otters. He is of the opinion that environmental factors cause this uneven pattern. The lecture, on the other hand, feels that this pattern created because there were different access for predators in different places. Also shallow or rocky water is not suitable for wales to hunt otters.
- playing computer games is waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.do you agree or disagree? 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement. The extended family (grandparent, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past. 70
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to so much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 76
- living 60
- Your job has more effect on your happiness than your social life does 30
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 234, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...pollution is the most effective factor. The lecture casts doubt on the claims made ...
^^^
Line 3, column 70, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun source seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of sources'.
Suggestion: a lot of sources
...ms that in the western coast there were a lot of source for contamination such as oil rigs many...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 282, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...cess for predators in different places. Also shallow or rocky water is not suitable ...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'furthermore', 'if', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'such as', 'first of all', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.242424242424 0.261695866417 93% => OK
Verbs: 0.159090909091 0.158904122519 100% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0871212121212 0.0723426182421 120% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0454545454545 0.0435111971325 104% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0340909090909 0.0277247811725 123% => OK
Prepositions: 0.147727272727 0.128828473217 115% => OK
Participles: 0.030303030303 0.0370669169778 82% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.56722536719 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00757575757576 0.0208969081088 36% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00378787878788 0.00154638098197 245% => OK
Determiners: 0.121212121212 0.128158765124 95% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00378787878788 0.0158828679856 24% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0151515151515 0.0114777025283 132% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1432.0 1645.83664459 87% => OK
No of words: 237.0 271.125827815 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.04219409283 6.08160592843 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.04852973271 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.37552742616 0.374372842146 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.282700421941 0.287516216867 98% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.177215189873 0.187439937562 95% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.10970464135 0.113142543107 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56722536719 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561181434599 0.539623497131 104% => OK
Word variations: 54.4437020048 53.8517498576 101% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0529801325 130% => OK
Sentence length: 13.9411764706 21.7502111507 64% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7221937743 49.3711431718 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.2352941176 132.220823453 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.9411764706 21.7502111507 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.705882352941 0.878197800319 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.39072847682 88% => OK
Readability: 42.2112186647 50.5018328374 84% => OK
Elegance: 1.7619047619 1.90840788429 92% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.621939127255 0.549887131256 113% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.10024746323 0.142949733639 70% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0755716428432 0.0787303798458 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.521401539835 0.631733273073 83% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.149403907198 0.139662658121 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.248865514648 0.266732575781 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131868761561 0.103435571967 127% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.403566972473 0.414875509568 97% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0392790982802 0.0530846634433 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.445076483418 0.40443939384 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0806241819863 0.0528353158467 153% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.26048565121 141% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.2958057395 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.