The following appeared in a letter from a homeowner to a friend.
"Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom work only part-time. Moreover, Adams' revenue last year was twice as high as that of Fitch and included home sales that averaged $168,000, compared to Fitch's $144,000. Homes listed with Adams sell faster as well: ten years ago I listed my home with Fitch, and it took more than four months to sell; last year, when I sold another home, I listed it with Adams, and it took only one month. Thus, if you want to sell your home quickly and at a good price, you should use Adams Realty."
The assumption of the homeowner is written in the memo that Adams Realty can sell homes quickly and at a good price sounds illogically convincing in several reasons. The Vice president ignored important information and some questions needed to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted results.
First, relies on the fact that many of agents of Fitch work part time, the author infers that they can not sell home quickly. However, the author ignores other effective factors for selling home. In fact, it is possible Fitch hire experienced employee that they have more experts in this business. In addition, this estate firm can use of new methods for selling that in more effective than what approach is used in Adams. Without considering these possible scenarios, the author can not justifiably conclude that Fitch can not sale homes quickly.
Second, serious of problems with the argument arises from the scant information on which it relies. The author comparing the average cost of the home is sold by these estate firms, and concludes that Adams gain more profits.
In the third place, the author for supports his recommendation cites a memory about selling two homes in different the time condition. It is entirely possible that ten years ago the demand for purchasing home was too low, because the few number of people who live in the city. However, the condition can be different in last years and increasing the population of city lead to increase the selling home.
In sum, the argument is flawed logically and therefore unconvincing. To strengthen the argument, the author must provide more statistical information about the number of homes, which was soled with these estate firms. To evaluate better the recommendation, it would be know about all effective factors in selling homes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | sapana | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | stevewang1007 | 79 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | siirsalvador | 75 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | aniketnichat | 63 | view |
| 2019-09-17 | suhas201227 | 83 | view |
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist."Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rat 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Attending a live performance (for example, a play, concert, or sporting event) is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Attending a live performance (for example, a play, concert, or sporting event) is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 70
- Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another. 58
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Attending a live performance (for example, a play, concert, or sporting event) is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 61, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
... fact that many of agents of Fitch work part time, the author infers that they can not se...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 235, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: 'few numbers'.
Suggestion: few numbers
...urchasing home was too low, because the few number of people who live in the city. However...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'third', 'as to', 'in addition', 'in fact', 'in the third place']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.266467065868 0.25644967241 104% => OK
Verbs: 0.158682634731 0.15541462614 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0838323353293 0.0836205057962 100% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0449101796407 0.0520304965353 86% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0209580838323 0.0272364105082 77% => OK
Prepositions: 0.140718562874 0.125424944231 112% => OK
Participles: 0.0538922155689 0.0416121511921 130% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.66134481657 2.79052419416 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0179640718563 0.026700313972 67% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.116766467066 0.113004496875 103% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0239520958084 0.0255425247493 94% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0149700598802 0.0127820249294 117% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1853.0 2731.13054187 68% => OK
No of words: 304.0 446.07635468 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.09539473684 6.12365571057 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.57801047555 91% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.371710526316 0.378187486979 98% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.266447368421 0.287650121315 93% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.194078947368 0.208842608468 93% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.125 0.135150697306 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66134481657 2.79052419416 95% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 207.018472906 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555921052632 0.469332199767 118% => OK
Word variations: 58.4801326604 52.1807786196 112% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 20.039408867 75% => OK
Sentence length: 20.2666666667 23.2022227129 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.4826502653 57.7814097925 51% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.533333333 141.986410481 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 23.2022227129 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8 0.724660767414 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.58251231527 56% => OK
Readability: 46.9114035088 51.9672348444 90% => OK
Elegance: 2.05333333333 1.8405768891 112% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356555828021 0.441005458295 81% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.107532650209 0.135418324435 79% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0642873298624 0.0829849096947 77% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.621047817325 0.58762219726 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.13029748577 0.147661913831 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154917624442 0.193483328276 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661893998606 0.0970749176394 68% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.359563220898 0.42659136922 84% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0727371061388 0.0774707102158 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239053851735 0.312017818177 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354601006969 0.0698173142475 51% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.33743842365 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.87684729064 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.82512315271 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 6.46551724138 124% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 5.36822660099 93% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.82389162562 71% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 14.657635468 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.