Due to technology, our traditional skills and was of living is altered. we can not prevent these change. what extent do u agree or disagree?
Nowadays, as consequences of the introduction of technology, the community of that region, undoubtedly, earning the stark benefits from it. Nevertheless, some traditionalists claim that it has an extreme repugnant impact on our traditional skills and lifestyle. To my mind, due to the enormous positive promotion of the technology we - any country - cannot stay isolated from it but, the pernicious impacts may be mitigated by the precise administration by the government of the country.
To begin with, as compared to the past, people are not a part of the laborious calculation of profit and loss, especially in the business sectors, due to the advent of computer software and advanced calculators. Not just this, but communication with any clients - probably who is located at the other corner of the world - become far easier as a result of the E-mail and latest messenger applications. Consider, for example, the Indian domestic market pronounced with 40% more profit than compared to the last decade, no doubt, due to the adequate use of software application called "SAP". Seen in this light, not to the business sector but, mostly the profit is earned by all other domains.
On the other side, over-reliance on these amenities, prove as a grave danger for our intellectual skills and approach to our lifestyles. By this I mean to say, people are less likely to do basic mathematical calculations by using mental skills - which are, undoubtedly, play an indispensable role in building our intellectual skills - and rather than that, prefer a way to use calculators. Additionally, E-communication is accountable for wiping out our handwriting skills. Thus, apart from the virtues it - the technology - has many detrimental Impacts, as well.
On the practical note, to overcome this issues the government put a ban on the usage of calculators, especially up to the higher secondary level of schooling. This ban - which was introduced in India in the year 2005 - prove as a blessing in disguise for the primary school students. Moreover, today even, many government job applications are only being accepted in handwritten formats. Eventually, these all are helpful in order to identify the basic skills of the person and, often, this makes a person keep in touch with our traditional skills.
In a nutshell, the cited evidence supports my view that albeit plenty of benefits of technology, with an adequate level of rules and regulations, we can refrain the negative impacts of it on our cultural lifestyle and skills, without being said. In the future, the aforementioned government approaches will no doubt grow more pronounced because of its procedure promotions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-08-25 | darshilbhayani92 | 73 | view |
- hould museums and art galleries be free of charge for the general public, or should a charge, even a voluntary charge, be levied for admittance? Discuss this issue, and give your opinion. 67
- Some people think that secondary school children should study international news as one of the school subjects. Other people think that it is a waste of valuable school time. What do you think? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example 67
- Care use lane in 1999. 73
- Transportation mode covered by per person annually in England in between 1985 and 2000. 84
- Some think that buildings should be constructed with functionality in mind, as it is more important than design. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 217, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...was introduced in India in the year 2005 - prove as a blessing in disguise for th...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'second', 'so', 'thus', 'well', 'apart from', 'for example', 'i mean', 'no doubt', 'as a result', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.243027888446 0.247107183377 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.0996015936255 0.155533422707 64% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0956175298805 0.0946595960268 101% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0537848605578 0.0501214627716 107% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0358565737052 0.0437548338989 82% => OK
Prepositions: 0.131474103586 0.122226691241 108% => OK
Participles: 0.0318725099602 0.0403226058552 79% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.19486593213 2.80594681477 114% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0298804780876 0.0326793684256 91% => OK
Particles: 0.00199203187251 0.00163938923432 122% => OK
Determiners: 0.127490039841 0.0861772015684 148% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00796812749004 0.021408717616 37% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00597609561753 0.011925033212 50% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2692.0 1933.35771543 139% => OK
No of words: 438.0 316.048096192 139% => OK
Chars per words: 6.14611872146 6.12580529183 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.20517956788 109% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.372146118721 0.374742101984 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.278538812785 0.28420135186 98% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.232876712329 0.203846283523 114% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.155251141553 0.137316102897 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19486593213 2.80594681477 114% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 176.037074148 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557077625571 0.56093040696 99% => OK
Word variations: 66.225646668 60.7387585426 109% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0891783567 106% => OK
Sentence length: 25.7647058824 20.7743622355 124% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5600661494 49.517814964 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.352941176 127.492653851 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7647058824 20.7743622355 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.882352941176 0.814263465372 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.99599198397 25% => OK
Readability: 53.6185871609 49.1944974215 109% => OK
Elegance: 2.14736842105 1.69124875643 127% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200933541034 0.332605444948 60% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.104408976569 0.102741220458 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0639540660847 0.0668466124924 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.580243061365 0.534860350844 108% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.173300334136 0.148594505496 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0904812335061 0.134430193775 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525002954753 0.0742795772207 71% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.362884418542 0.324371583561 112% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0751435613865 0.0638462369009 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144514960938 0.228012699653 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277044091896 0.058150111329 48% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.68436873747 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.41683366733 59% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 5.90881763527 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.5751503006 39% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 1.9629258517 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 10.0 10.4468937876 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.