Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A good leader should spend more time listening to other people's ideas than taking his or her own ideas.
A good leadership is an integral part of a successful business. The question is, however, what is the distinctive characteristic of a good leader. There is controversy as to whether or not a good leader should spend time to listen to other people’s ideas than thinking only of his or her own ideas. I strongly agree with the statement and I firmly believe that the skill of listening is an essential part of a good leader characteristic and my reasons for this advocacy are as follows.
To begin with, so crucial is the listening skill for a leader that it plays a colossally significant role in the quality of a leader performance. In fact, the ability to listening to others’ ideas determines a leader’s influence, and eventually his or her success in their business. A leader beings a good and active listener encourages his or her employees to share their ideas with others and it is crystal clear that two brain is much better than one brain! One the other hand, if their employees know that their leader does not care about their ideas, they will not share them and it is not hard to imagine if their idea is of great value and innovation, where this business will be leaded—surely, to not success and prosperity. It may be claim that a leader experience and knowledge is enough for a business to be successful; on the contrary, being knowledgeable and experienced, indeed, help a leader to come up with the best decision about how to deal with employees’ idea’s to best exploit these ideas—it is the sheer teamwork.
Moreover, being a good listener is of great importance for a leader in order to maintain a solid relationship between employees, and thereby improving the workplace atmosphere. By listening to their employees’ ideas and plans, in fact, leaders imply that their employees are valuable assets of their business and they appreciate them. By listening with an empathetic ear and caring genuinely to their employees with open-mindedness and without trying to judge their ideas at the first step, leaders can establish a quality relationship. Employees can thrive in this situation and become more enthusiastic and energetic than before—this in long run results not only the success of a business, but also the prosperity of a society.
To sum up, with all this taken into account, as far as I am concerned, a ‘good leader’ is a good listener mainly due to the fact that being a good listener helps a business to push the envelope more than the situation in which the leaders is the only ‘master-mind’ as well as it helps to improve the office environment in an excellent manner.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-20 | toefl 2019 | 73 | view |
| 2019-04-20 | toefl 2019 | 76 | view |
| 2019-04-21 | Raed Mudawar | 81 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 169, Rule ID: WHETHER[4]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; whether or not; as to whether
... of a good leader. There is controversy as to whether or not a good leader should spend time to list...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 72, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...into account, as far as I am concerned, a 'good leader' is a good liste...
^
Line 7, column 340, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an excellent manner" with adverb for "excellent"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...helps to improve the office environment in an excellent manner.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'thus', 'well', 'as to', 'in fact', 'as well as', 'on the contrary', 'to begin with', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.228239845261 0.229887763892 99% => OK
Verbs: 0.121856866538 0.158761421928 77% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0909090909091 0.0866891130778 105% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0522243713733 0.046263068375 113% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0580270793037 0.0685040099705 85% => OK
Prepositions: 0.117988394584 0.118717715034 99% => OK
Participles: 0.0212765957447 0.0351676179071 61% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.18896821803 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0406189555126 0.0309702414327 131% => OK
Particles: 0.00386847195358 0.00188951952338 205% => OK
Determiners: 0.104448742747 0.0887237588012 118% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0116054158607 0.0209618222197 55% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00773694390716 0.0139019557991 56% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2663.0 2387.08602151 112% => OK
No of words: 448.0 408.028673835 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.94419642857 5.86048508987 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.48200974243 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.319196428571 0.338922669872 94% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.256696428571 0.251872472559 102% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.203125 0.174417080927 116% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.15625 0.112833075102 138% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18896821803 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482142857143 0.524397521467 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 54.0816762623 59.2087087015 91% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6684587814 68% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 20.5533526081 156% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.7044652935 48.84282405 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 190.214285714 120.699889404 158% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 20.5533526081 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.14285714286 0.644075263715 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.54480286738 54% => OK
Readability: 57.6696428571 45.7405998639 126% => OK
Elegance: 1.58333333333 1.45489161554 109% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328404864643 0.300154397459 109% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.175192692947 0.103427244359 169% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0681217769652 0.0752933317313 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.616344819076 0.497263757937 124% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.128164663999 0.151897553556 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156559978477 0.114077575197 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11622632575 0.0781384742642 149% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.41569666868 0.336927656856 123% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.110041494761 0.067059652881 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236922086414 0.210909579961 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0821081851574 0.0618886996521 133% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8870967742 109% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.86379928315 26% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.91756272401 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 13.0 8.42114695341 154% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.4623655914 41% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.75985663082 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 14.0 13.6433691756 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.