Some people feel that certain workers like nurses, doctors and teachers are undervalued and should be paid more, especially when other people like film actors or company bosses are paid huge sums of money that are out of proportion to the importance of the work that they do.
-How far do you agree?
-What criteria should be used to decide how much people are paid?
Nowadays, the salaries are based on a number of criteria such as qualification and experiences, but this got questioned by certain society. It is believed that, the certain professions (nurses, doctors and teachers) have underpaid by the societies, compared to actors or company bosses.
Some people would believe that certain professions might get undervalued according to the criteria, while some people would claim that specialists should get higher salaries compared to those who get paid in a lump sum. However, this is a seldom case. Those expertises are unique in value and those job opportunities are always demanding. Not all the professions even for film actors or CEOs could acquire a lot of money. Sometimes the passion for the job and the amount of time invested to complete the task would not reflect in the amount of payments. These factors cannot be measured as a number. The measurement for salary settlement is a questionable while the payment for a certain professions might undervalued.
To set the criteria for salary is difficult. Until now, there are several criteria have been used by a society. Qualification has long been used as a yardstick, but this found to be not good. The reason for this is, some people might have a great qualification but might not be suitable for the company’s perspective or its environment. Another measure is, relevant years of experiences. However, this also not a good measure either as sometimes younger person can perform better than someone with lots of experience.
I believe that some certain professions get under paid compared to other professions. Therefore, their payment should get evaluated in a consistent basis by an independent body.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-02 | hoangnm | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-12 | Shrasth Kumar | 67 | view |
| 2018-08-09 | zohre-h | 60 | view |
| 2017-10-08 | BLACK WOLF | 61 | view |
| 2016-09-12 | Monica1 | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage change in the share of international students among university graduates in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006. 31
- The map below shows three proposed sites for a new hypermarket A B and C in the city of Pellington 91
- The line chart shows the average annual growth rates during selected periods, selected based on data availability, for population growth, energy growth, and real GDP growth between 1820 and 2010. 61
- The charts below show the results of a survey about what people of different age groups say makes them most happy. 78
- Some people claim that living in big cities is creating difficulties whereas others think it makes easier. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'therefore', 'while', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.230769230769 0.247107183377 93% => OK
Verbs: 0.166666666667 0.155533422707 107% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0737179487179 0.0946595960268 78% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0512820512821 0.0501214627716 102% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0128205128205 0.0437548338989 29% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.115384615385 0.122226691241 94% => OK
Participles: 0.0608974358974 0.0403226058552 151% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.98753421487 2.80594681477 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0224358974359 0.0326793684256 69% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.134615384615 0.0861772015684 156% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0384615384615 0.021408717616 180% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00320512820513 0.011925033212 27% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1713.0 1933.35771543 89% => OK
No of words: 277.0 316.048096192 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.18411552347 6.12580529183 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20517956788 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.379061371841 0.374742101984 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.29963898917 0.28420135186 105% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.209386281588 0.203846283523 103% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.140794223827 0.137316102897 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98753421487 2.80594681477 106% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.037074148 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548736462094 0.56093040696 98% => OK
Word variations: 55.4684200783 60.7387585426 91% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0891783567 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.2941176471 20.7743622355 78% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2674053916 49.517814964 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.764705882 127.492653851 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2941176471 20.7743622355 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.470588235294 0.814263465372 58% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.99599198397 0% => OK
Readability: 46.258016564 49.1944974215 94% => OK
Elegance: 1.76388888889 1.69124875643 104% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321315513093 0.332605444948 97% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0953002864693 0.102741220458 93% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.100444773054 0.0668466124924 150% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.441471348718 0.534860350844 83% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.180218732011 0.148594505496 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0985683198808 0.134430193775 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068974926922 0.0742795772207 93% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.224784033849 0.324371583561 69% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.135907427833 0.0638462369009 213% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204724611627 0.228012699653 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.081225590087 0.058150111329 140% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.68436873747 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.41683366733 146% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 5.90881763527 118% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.5751503006 39% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 1.9629258517 102% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.4468937876 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.