Teachers’ salaries should be based on the academic performance of their students.
Education and teaching are of the most demanding and valuable jobs in the word. We witness, once in a while, that teachers protest against low salary, while their role in preparing the next generation is invaluable. Meanwhile, some expert suggest that they should be paid based on the performance of their students. I personally believe, if the performance of teachers be evaluated based on a wide range of criteria to include different aspect of students’ academic performances this policy benefit students and teachers as well.
First and foremost important consequence of applying such policy is that not only less privileged students will be noticed, but also clever students are further supported to achieve better results. To illustrate it more, it should be recognized that clever students usually are self-motivated and require less support from their teacher, thus, with new policy, teachers will be encouraged to put effort to improve the academic performance of all students including clever ones. Therefore, all students receive sufficient attention from their teachers.
Furthermore, no one can deny the fact that a little bit sense of competition induces motivation, and teachers are not an exception. Teachers through working with this policy become more interested in novel teaching strategies that need to be employed for students with different learning capabilities. The more skilled the teacher, the deeper is his/her understanding of the need of their students. Therefore, along with their students, teachers try to utilize different methods to get to know their students and their need better. This attempt enhances their skills.
Nevertheless, the effort of a caring and patient teacher who induces motivation in a really weak and unnoticed student should not be remained unappreciated. Nor does their diligence in supporting really distinguished students to take part in national or international exams. Although, these students are rare and their performance does not greatly affect the average performance of a class, teachers with such endeavor should be truly honored even if the average performance of their student is not as much as their peers.
To summarize, well-defined criteria for evaluating the performance of education benefit both side of this sensitive relationship.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-02 | bmartinurcelay | 58 | view |
| 2019-09-29 | adamvg | 75 | view |
| 2019-09-24 | 08sandip | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-22 | Navis | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-16 | raolitesh@gmail.com | 66 | view |
- The following appeared in a memo from a budget planner for the city of Grandview."When the Grandview Symphony was established ten years ago, the city of Grandview agreed to provide the symphony with annual funding until the symphony became self-sustaining 54
- The general welfare of a nation's people is a better indication of that nation's greatness than are the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In d 54
- Teachers’ salaries should be based on the academic performance of their students. 66
- In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions. 50
- In an attempt to improve highway safety, Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways. But this effort has failed: the number of accidents has not decreased, and, based on reports by the highway patro 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 46, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...ermore, no one can deny the fact that a little bit sense of competition induces motivation...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'furthermore', 'if', 'nevertheless', 'really', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'well', 'while']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.234096692112 0.240241500013 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.160305343511 0.157235817809 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0966921119593 0.0880659088768 110% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0839694656489 0.0497285424764 169% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0458015267176 0.0444667217837 103% => OK
Prepositions: 0.117048346056 0.12292977631 95% => OK
Participles: 0.0483460559796 0.0406280797675 119% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.01519765489 2.79330140395 108% => OK
Infinitives: 0.027989821883 0.030933414821 90% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0814249363868 0.0997080785238 82% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0178117048346 0.0249443105267 71% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00508905852417 0.0148568991511 34% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2323.0 2732.02544248 85% => OK
No of words: 354.0 452.878318584 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.56214689266 6.0361032391 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.58838876751 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.449152542373 0.366273622748 123% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.375706214689 0.280924506359 134% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.279661016949 0.200843997647 139% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.169491525424 0.132149295362 128% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01519765489 2.79330140395 108% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 219.290929204 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54802259887 0.48968727796 112% => OK
Word variations: 60.1640055146 55.4138127331 109% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6194690265 78% => OK
Sentence length: 22.125 23.380412469 95% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.5540800716 59.4972553346 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.1875 141.124799967 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 23.380412469 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.75 0.674092028746 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 59.6956214689 51.4728631049 116% => OK
Elegance: 1.37719298246 1.64882698954 84% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.498361451467 0.391690518653 127% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.108804792765 0.123202303941 88% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0683568548429 0.077325440228 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.552199333867 0.547984918172 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.183367421334 0.149214159877 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190242194713 0.161403998019 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12610444193 0.0892212321368 141% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.299928417118 0.385218514788 78% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.094506476123 0.0692045440612 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.305404971656 0.275328986314 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118501985482 0.0653680567796 181% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 7.22455752212 125% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.5995575221 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.