Some Governments say how many children a family can have in their country should be strictly controlled. They may control the number of children someone has through taxes. Is It sometimes necessary and right for a government to control the population in this way?
It is thought by some politicians that number of children that every family can have should be sternly controlled by government. The predominant decision is to tax population for having kids. To some extent I agree with this statement, however, there are some points need to be clarified.
The payment for giving a birth to a child and forthcoming maintaining until he or her is 18 can significantly increase economic progress of a country. There are rich families who tend to have more than two children can pay taxes and benefit society. To give a clear example, Chinese government made a similar decision in the mid of 70s. They significantly enlarged children’ quota and as a result, China is one of the most successful countries in the world now.
One the other hand, this problem is also related to the countries of the third world. There are economic instability and unrest there. People of the middle class tend to have no more than one child in a family. However, people who struggle poverty usually don’t limit themselves in number of children for unknown reasons. Thus, a lot of families get bogged in poverty and misery along with their kids. And if the Government would compel them to pay taxes, they will probably be flooded by poorness.
The best solution in this case is to afford free education for children of poor families, but with some restrictions. The only one child should have a right for the tuition free education. The idea of free studying will encourage parents to give a birth of the one child only and generally, such solution will make people happier and the world better.
In conclusion, controlling the number of kids in the family through taxes is a decent opportunity for rich countries, but third world countries can’t afford this way of control, as it will probably inflict bad its inhabitants.
- You have recently moved to a different house. Write a letter to an English-speaking friend.Explain why you have movedDescribe a new houseInvite your friend to come and visit 73
- Nowadays it is possible to use computers and mobile phones for automatic language translation, and there is no need for human translators and interpreters. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
- You find that your study load is too heavy. Write a letter to your college teacher explaining why you need to withdraw from two courses. Ask if it is possible to obtain a refund. 80
- Today more people are travelling than ever before. Why is this the case? What are the benefits of travelling for the traveler? 78
- You recently attended a meeting at a hotel When you returned home you found you had left some important papers at the hotel Write a letter to the manager of the hotel Say where you think you left the papers Explain why they are so important Tell the manag 47
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 45, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to free'
Suggestion: to free
...best solution in this case is to afford free education for children of poor families...
^^^^
Line 4, column 190, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...a right for the tuition free education. The idea of free studying will encourage pa...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'third', 'thus', 'in conclusion', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.247191011236 0.247107183377 100% => OK
Verbs: 0.140449438202 0.155533422707 90% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0786516853933 0.0946595960268 83% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0421348314607 0.0501214627716 84% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0308988764045 0.0437548338989 71% => OK
Prepositions: 0.11797752809 0.122226691241 97% => OK
Participles: 0.0337078651685 0.0403226058552 84% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.74947760677 2.80594681477 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0308988764045 0.0326793684256 95% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.109550561798 0.0861772015684 127% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0308988764045 0.021408717616 144% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00842696629213 0.011925033212 71% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1851.0 1933.35771543 96% => OK
No of words: 315.0 316.048096192 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87619047619 6.12580529183 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20517956788 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.336507936508 0.374742101984 90% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.257142857143 0.28420135186 90% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.190476190476 0.203846283523 93% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.107936507937 0.137316102897 79% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74947760677 2.80594681477 98% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.037074148 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.56093040696 95% => OK
Word variations: 55.4699723339 60.7387585426 91% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0891783567 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.5294117647 20.7743622355 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2258893333 49.517814964 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.882352941 127.492653851 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5294117647 20.7743622355 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.529411764706 0.814263465372 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.99599198397 50% => OK
Readability: 44.243697479 49.1944974215 90% => OK
Elegance: 1.86842105263 1.69124875643 110% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.471948594222 0.332605444948 142% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0924782384176 0.102741220458 90% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0892324530214 0.0668466124924 133% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.520409390795 0.534860350844 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.170208914839 0.148594505496 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167235813478 0.134430193775 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590124326623 0.0742795772207 79% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.340525109855 0.324371583561 105% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.106662427884 0.0638462369009 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.296064847399 0.228012699653 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0211938639552 0.058150111329 36% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.68436873747 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.41683366733 59% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 5.90881763527 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 2.5751503006 194% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 1.9629258517 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 14.0 10.4468937876 134% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.