In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes the government has to pay for this care.
Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
In recent years, the number of people who live in nursing homes in England, Wales and Scotland has been increasing. Some people believe that the family should pay for the care of nursing homes. However, I argue that the government should take responsibility for the cost. The first reason is that some people are too old to pay for the care of other family members and the second reason is that some families cannot afford to pay for the care.
The government should pay for the cost of nursing homes because some family members are also too old to pay for the cost of care. Some countries have an aging population due to healthier lifestyles and the advanced state of medical technology. Take Japanese society as an example; it is predicted that one-third of the population in 20 years will be over 65 years. This means that 70 year old people might have to pay for the care of their elderly parents in the future. I therefore believe that taxpayer money should pay for elderly care.
The second reason is that the financial situation varies depending on the family. In the case that families cannot afford to pay for the cost, they have to take care of their elderly loved ones. While some people think it is natural to take care of elderly people and they are willing to bath them, feed them and shower them, other people find it very difficult. It is not uncommon that family members use financial, physical, and psychological abuse on their elderly parents because of the stress from taking care of them. For example, there were an increase in the number of cases of euthanasia in countries where this is legal during the recent global economic recession.
In conclusion, I strongly agree with the idea that the state should pay for the care of the aged because some family members are too old to pay for them and it might be a heavy burden to take care of them at home. Therefore, the government should establish their pension system for the care of elderly citizens.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-02 | yasir2002011 | 67 | view |
| 2019-05-17 | mleopoldo | 61 | view |
| 2019-02-13 | Alex_45 | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-18 | Ehsan Razmara | 73 | view |
| 2018-09-27 | ansgusn | 56 | view |
- Despite the increased access to education a significant number of people cannot read or write What are the disadvantages and what action should the government take 78
- A large company in your area has decided to spend a certain amount of money, either to sponsor a local children’s sports team for two years, or to pay for two open-air concerts. It has asked for feedback from the general public.Write a letter to the co 78
- Despite the increased access to education a significant number of people cannot read or write What are the disadvantages and what action should the government take 77
- The first chart below shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross-section of 100,000 people asking if they traveled abroad and why they traveled for the period 1994-98. The second chart shows their destinations over the same period. Write a report 56
- Some people believe that children can learn effectively by watching TV and they should be encouraged to watch TV both at home and at school To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: TO_BATH[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to bathe'?
Suggestion: to bathe
... of elderly people and they are willing to bath them, feed them and shower them, other ...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'third', 'while', 'for example', 'in conclusion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.230971128609 0.247107183377 93% => OK
Verbs: 0.157480314961 0.155533422707 101% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0866141732283 0.0946595960268 92% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0314960629921 0.0501214627716 63% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0524934383202 0.0437548338989 120% => OK
Prepositions: 0.162729658793 0.122226691241 133% => OK
Participles: 0.0288713910761 0.0403226058552 72% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.33947721233 2.80594681477 83% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0288713910761 0.0326793684256 88% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.112860892388 0.0861772015684 131% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0288713910761 0.021408717616 135% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00524934383202 0.011925033212 44% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1973.0 1933.35771543 102% => OK
No of words: 351.0 316.048096192 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62108262108 6.12580529183 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20517956788 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.316239316239 0.374742101984 84% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.196581196581 0.28420135186 69% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.119658119658 0.203846283523 59% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0797720797721 0.137316102897 58% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33947721233 2.80594681477 83% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.037074148 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.430199430199 0.56093040696 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 43.5862049457 60.7387585426 72% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0891783567 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.9375 20.7743622355 106% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3529203967 49.517814964 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.3125 127.492653851 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9375 20.7743622355 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.6875 0.814263465372 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.99599198397 25% => OK
Readability: 41.5956196581 49.1944974215 85% => OK
Elegance: 1.75 1.69124875643 103% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.482739912605 0.332605444948 145% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.164556555383 0.102741220458 160% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.104061732696 0.0668466124924 156% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.57881021758 0.534860350844 108% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.146879071874 0.148594505496 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.23319031112 0.134430193775 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109743227245 0.0742795772207 148% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.590428206761 0.324371583561 182% => Paragraphs have same ideas.
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0570580336549 0.0638462369009 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.400444701739 0.228012699653 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423014396546 0.058150111329 73% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.68436873747 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.41683366733 59% => OK
Positive topic words: 12.0 5.90881763527 203% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.5751503006 78% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 1.9629258517 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 14.0 10.4468937876 134% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.