Tpo 28
In this set of material, the author and the lecturer disagree on the merit of the truth behind whether E. Peary who was an adventurer and explorer did reach the North Pole in 1909. The reading passage states that there is no doubt that Peary did arrive at the North Pole. Furthermore, the writer in the passage suggests that the investigation of the National Geography Society support that trip. Also, the recent sailing of Tom Avery in the same direction proves it took that fast of thirty-seven days to reach the Arctic, and a presence of photographs with shadows in which we can measure the sun height in that area is strong evidence for that trip. In contrary, the professor in the lecture challenges those arguments of the passage and states three reasons proving that they are skeptical. Following is a brief interpretation of his perspective.
First of all, the writer in the passage asserts that the investigation of the National Geographical Society was one of substantial evidence to convict that the trip of E. Peary was right. However, the speaker in the listening passage refutes this evidence. He believes that this society had several of E. Peary's best friends, also the National Geographical Society had funded this trip, and since the investigation took two days only to declare the reality of that expedition, therefore, it is not a crucial evidence to proof this trip was biased.
Secondly, the article claims that even though the voyage of E. Peary was so fast and took thirty-seven days to reach the North Pole, but the other recent trip of Tom Avery who mimics the ship, the sailing way to arrive at the Arctic which arrived within less than Peary's time, proves that it is possible to sail among that harsh conditions successfully. Nevertheless, the listening passage's professor refutes this experiment conducting that it is impossible to travel that fast with old equipment. Also, Avery's ship was not as heavy as Peary's ship. In fact, Tom did not take his food with him, and all his food dropped by a plane. Therefore, the conditions of voyaging were variable.
Last but not the least, the reading passage states that the presence of photographs that taken in the North Pole could be one of the best evidence to prove that trip. Because we can calculate the shadow in those photos, and estimate the position of the sun in the Antriactica which is different from any other position on the Earth. Whereas, the professor in the lecture rebuffs this evidence, too. He says that those pictures were ancient and they took with old cameras; he believes that those photos are faded and fuzzy or unclear to measure and estimate the shadows or the position of the sun in that region. In fact, we can not be sure where they took those pictures.
- In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at young age. 70
- Essay topics: "Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central Plaza store owners believe that the decrease in their business is d 54
- Tpo27 80
- Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they already know how to do well? 70
- Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your position you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain h 83
Comments
Essay evaluation report
the investigation of the National Geography Society support that trip.
the investigation of the National Geography Society supports that trip.
even though the voyage of E. Peary was so fast and took thirty-seven days to reach the North Pole, but the other recent trip
Description: don't put 'even though' 'but' in one sentence.
and all his food dropped by a plane.
and all his food are dropped by a plane.
the presence of photographs that taken in the North Pole could be one of the best evidence
the presence of photographs that are taken in the North Pole could be one of the best evidence
the presence of photographs taken in the North Pole could be one of the best evidence
flaws:
No. of Words: 476 250
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 22 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 19 12
No. of Words: 476 250
No. of Characters: 2238 1200
No. of Different Words: 205 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.671 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.702 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.521 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 147 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 118 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 70 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 40 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25.053 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 15.449 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.737 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.312 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.312 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.118 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'passages'' or 'passage's'?
Suggestion: passages'; passage's
...ccessfully. Nevertheless, the listening passages professor refutes this experiment condu...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'nevertheless', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'therefore', 'whereas', 'in fact', 'no doubt', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.264875239923 0.261695866417 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.138195777351 0.158904122519 87% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0671785028791 0.0723426182421 93% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0383877159309 0.0435111971325 88% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0326295585413 0.0277247811725 118% => OK
Prepositions: 0.142034548944 0.128828473217 110% => OK
Participles: 0.0191938579655 0.0370669169778 52% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.58962979458 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0191938579655 0.0208969081088 92% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.149712092131 0.128158765124 117% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00767754318618 0.0158828679856 48% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0134357005758 0.0114777025283 117% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2762.0 1645.83664459 168% => OK
No of words: 476.0 271.125827815 176% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.8025210084 6.08160592843 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.04852973271 115% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.317226890756 0.374372842146 85% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.247899159664 0.287516216867 86% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.155462184874 0.187439937562 83% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0966386554622 0.113142543107 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58962979458 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 145.348785872 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.445378151261 0.539623497131 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 50.0160446152 53.8517498576 93% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0529801325 146% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0526315789 21.7502111507 115% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.0107700526 49.3711431718 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.368421053 132.220823453 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0526315789 21.7502111507 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.789473684211 0.878197800319 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 49.8425475453 50.5018328374 99% => OK
Elegance: 2.03669724771 1.90840788429 107% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.740654085891 0.549887131256 135% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.145289186979 0.142949733639 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0885033378887 0.0787303798458 112% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.571779269588 0.631733273073 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.219021359638 0.139662658121 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.341391725166 0.266732575781 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.182618501935 0.103435571967 177% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.556261523516 0.414875509568 134% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0822524049575 0.0530846634433 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.601608752256 0.40443939384 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602994466447 0.0528353158467 114% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.26048565121 188% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.49668874172 143% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.2958057395 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.