Many countries spend a lot of money in art. Some people think investment in art is necessary, but others say money is better spent on public services and facilities. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is one of the fads that many countries nowadays pour more funds in art. Such a trend has led to two opposite views; some people opine that the money spent in art is necessary, while others dispute that the government funds should be invested on public services and facilities. In my view, the government should invest a reasonable proportion of the financial income in art, and thereby improving people's mental wellbeing, but the improvement of public services and facilities shall never be overlooked.
People who are in favour of investing funds in art might contend that art is an effective way to restore people's energy. In the past several decades, more art museums and theatres have been built using the government funds. These places have offered the public more chances to relax themselves from the work. If people work continuously without attending some recreational activities, such as visiting art museums or watching operas, they may be less productive towards their work. In contrast, after relaxing themselves in the art world, many people can recover their energy to work more effectively.
On the contrary, others argue that the government should spend money on public services and facilities instead of art. They may think that citizens can reap more benefits from public services and facilities. For example, with more money spent in progressing education and medical system, students can receive better education to improve employability and patients have more chances to survive from severe diseases. Also, businessmen can discover more business opportunities if more roads and communication facilities are constructed.
From my point of view, the government does need to invest a fair amount of money in art. The artistic facilities like museums and cinemas attract more people to experience and enjoy artworks, and thereby bringing happiness to their lives. However, the major focus of the government is always to provide the public with more comprehensive public services and reliable facilities, as this is the fundamental obligation of a government.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-23 | aidaaaa | 62 | view |
| 2020-05-03 | arezooch1 | 87 | view |
| 2019-02-25 | HARPREET KAUR MAAN | 78 | view |
| 2019-01-02 | meannothing | 84 | view |
- The following appeared in a memorandum written by the chairperson of the West Egg Town Council."Two years ago, consultants predicted that West Egg's landfill, which is used for garbage disposal, would be completely filled within five years. During the pas 54
- The following appeared as part of a campaign to sell advertising time on a local radio station to local businesses:"The Cumquat Café began advertising on our local radio station this year and was delighted to see its business increase by 10 percent over 69
- The following recommendation appeared in a memo from the mayor of the town of Hopewell."Two years ago, the nearby town of Ocean View built a new municipal golf course and resort hotel. During the past two years, tourism in Ocean View has increased, new bu 70
- The following appeared in a memo from the new vice president of Sartorian, a company that manufactures men's clothing."Five years ago, at a time when we had difficulties in obtaining reliable supplies of high quality wool fabric, we discontinued productio 50
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 63
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, so, well, while, for example, in contrast, such as, in my view, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1765.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36474164134 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81354566496 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534954407295 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8191219367 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.666666667 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9333333333 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32660528804 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120716092235 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867967500477 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210637665865 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0705197392812 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.