do you agree or disagree?visiting museum is the best way to get information about a country .
The question is whether visiting museum is the best way to get information about a country or not. Everyone in consideration to his private vantage point can maintain a specific direction toward this view; however I am inclined to refute it. In my perspective, there is a worthwhile way to gain useful information about a community or country that I will tender it in following:
To begin whit, it is axiomatic that the past of every country plays a crucial role in knowing it, however due to lack of space in the museums, the curators prefer to select the most conspicuous objects and materials for their museums as a gold blow, silver coins, the most appealing skeleton and silk carpet and list goes on; while other activities possibly have been underestimated in the development of a society.
The second reason why I reject this idea lies in the fact that majority of museums are often private. Since the wealthy people have a great passion to gather old materials as private collection, the governments would rather sell this right to them in return much more money. It is kind of mutualism relationship that two side of dealing will derive a benefit. On the other hand, private curators will rise up the price of visiting and it goes without saying that visitors and tourists will be reluctant to spend money for an hour.
I am going to empower my arguments by following discussion. There is a thing a bit of different here. As an archeologist believe that the most basic approach for gaining an understanding from a country is the attendance in there and meeting with alive people. Nobody could overlook the effective role of ancient ages in constructing a society; however the most vital thing is current life. For obtaining information about a community, you need to walk in the street and observe people how to behave, eat, and communicate and so on. In fact culture is the most important factor that nobody can find in the museums.
By taking all above mentioned arguments, this conclusion could be drawn that the museums are a small section in knowing a society. For better perceiving a country, you need to enter and watch it in the present time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-12-13 | peerless alex | 81 | view |
- Tpo28 83
- do you agree or disagree?Television advertising directed toward young children should not be allowed. 82
- Tpo 23 80
- the state should set fines or penalties for companies which produce pollution or it should find other ways to deal with the pollution problem. which one is better? 90
- do you agree or disagree?visiting museum is the best way to get information about a country . 81
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: It is kind of mutualism relationship that two side of dealing will derive a benefit.
Error: mutualism Suggestion: No alternate word
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 25 in 30
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 375 350
No. of Characters: 1749 1500
No. of Different Words: 210 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.401 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.664 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.683 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 123 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 96 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 55 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 39 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.438 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 17.66 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.295 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.439 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.064 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, second, so, while, in fact, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1795.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78666666667 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72980455141 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570666666667 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => OK
Sentence length SD: 116.129353166 48.9658058833 237% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 119.666666667 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86666666667 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205057781637 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065366417625 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132448381472 0.0737576698707 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110071374073 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114686353659 0.0645574589148 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.002688172 185% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.