the diagrams below show the growth in population of australia in 2001
The provided pie charts demonstrates the data about raising of Australian population in 2001. Overall, population grew by immigrants and natural increase and the proportion of them was nearly on par.
It is clear from the first pie chart; the population increased about 5 percent and the ratio of two sources (natural increase and immigrants) about 3 and 2 percent respectively. According to second pie chart, more than a half of total growth accounted for natural growth whereas about forty percent of total witnessed for immigrants.
Third pie chart illustrates that about a third of immigrants made up North and West Europe in contrast with South and East Europe consisted for about a fifth of total immigrants. Third large proportion (23 %) amounted for Asia while a tiny minority of total was New Zealand, Americans and Middle Asia, 9, 8 and 5 percent accordingly
To sum up, both sources played a vital role on the growth of population and the most immigrants came from Europe in 2001.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-21 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-20 | khanhkhanhlhp | 78 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 11 | view |
| 2024-12-08 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-29 | Nguyen Thinh | 84 | view |
- some people think that universities should provide with konwledge and skills needed in the workplace .Others think taht the true function of a universityshould be to give access to knowladge for its own sake ,regardless of whether the course is usefull to 67
- obesity problem of children 11
- the pie chart below show units of electricity production by fuel source in australia and france in 1980 and 2000 56
- Some people think that scientists expirementing with animals in a labaratory is the only way we can guarantee new products will be safe for human use 61
- The graph below shows the consuption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a european county between 1979 and 2004 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, if, second, so, third, whereas, while, in contrast, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 826.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97590361446 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76555964069 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578313253012 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1852083623 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.666666667 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6666666667 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.5 5.23603664747 258% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119212358196 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715157469111 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448334632247 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0977123126914 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662295936816 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.