The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
The tables contain the data of trading of coffee and bananas in two different years in five different countries. The spectacular feature of this chart is paramount sales of bananas in Switzerland during 2004.
At a fleeting glance, it is clearly observed that there was a dramatic burgeon in the vending of coffee in the United Kingdom from 1999 to 2004. However, trading in Denmark as well as Sweden slightly surged with a profit of 0.2 million Euros while Belgium earned a financial gain of 0.7 million euros which was three and half times more as contrasted to the Denmark and Sweden.
Moving further, Albeit Switzerland trebled its sales of bananas in the given time interval whereas vending of Denmark and Sweden collapsed by 1.1 & 0.8 million Euros. Furthermore, UK and Belgium rapidly soared their sales from 1 and 0.6 million euros to 5.5 and 4 million euros respectively.
To sum up, the lowest amount of sales of coffee of bananas could be seen in Sweden and Denmark respectively.
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world. 81
- The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university. 11
- The graphs below show the types of music albums purchased by people in Britain according to sex and age. 78
- Modern technology has made it easier for individuals to download copyrighted music and books from the internet for no charge.To what extent is this a positive or a negative development? 56
- Many office authorities impose a restriction on smoking within the office premises. Some governments have even banned smoking in all public places. This is a good idea but it takes away some of our freedom.What are your opinions on this? 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ros which was three and half times more as contrasted to the Denmark and Sweden. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, well, whereas, while, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 834.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9349112426 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60087821208 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591715976331 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4985338716 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.142857143 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4285714286 5.23603664747 199% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187920291409 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977761311212 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065738379585 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126227923424 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0809128825793 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.