The world natural resources are consumed at an ever-increased rate.
What are the causes of this situation? What are the solutions?
The overconsumption of natural resources has evolved as a major topic of concern in recent years. This
alarming trend is caused by a few factors, and it must be addressed by a number of definite actions.
The increasingly high level of exploitation of natural resources could be ascribed to a number of
reasons. The most obvious reason is the tremendous demand for resources in developing countries,
such as China and Brazil. The citizens of these countries are becoming increasingly wealthy, and they
may now afford a living standard that is associated with a higher level of resource consumption. A clear
example of this is the widespread use of cars among tens of millions of middle-income Chinese
nationals, which may have contributed substantially to the burning of oil on a global scale. Besides, the
over-dependence on natural resources, such as fossil fuels, is another significant reason to consider. In
Vietnam, for example, the majority of electricity is generated in thermal power stations, in which a vast
amount of coal is the burnt on a daily basis.
Some measures can be taken to mitigate the problem of over-consuming Earth’s resources. The most
practical measure at the moment is to reduce the demand for resources in developing countries. This
can be done by mass-producing energy-efficient products, such as hybrid cars, and selling these items
at a low price to citizens of these nations. If such a measure is implemented, these people may still
benefit from the modern living standard without over-consuming natural resources. Besides, the most
sustainable solution is to lower the reliance on natural resources by taking advantage of alternative
sources. For instance, wind and tidal power in the Netherlands, nuclear power in Japan and solar power
in the United States have all proven their efficiency in energy production. These forms of energy should
be used in other parts of the world as well, to minimise the global dependence on fossil fuels.
All the existing data provides a concrete foundation that the overexploitation of natural resources
derives from the strong demand in developing countries and the over-reliance on these types of
resources. Strong measures, such as reducing the aforementioned demand and making use of
alternative energy sources, must be implemented to tackle this situation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-01-19 | phuong cao | 67 | view |
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football While other people think that taking part in individual sports like tennis or swimming is better Discuss both views and give your own opinion 95
- As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree? 89
- Many people believe that children should be educated by the nature while others think it wastes their time and they should only study at school. Which option do you choose? 89
- Essay topics: Some people think that everyone has the right to have access to university education, and that governments should make it free for all students no matter financial background they have. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opini 89
- Fossil fuels such as coal oil and natural gas are used in many countries The use of alternative sources of energy including wind and solar power is encouraged Is this trend is a positive or negative development 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 27, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...g countries, such as China and Brazil. The citizens of these countries are becomin...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, may, so, still, well, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2014.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41397849462 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2137273849 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524193548387 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 627.3 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7344607313 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.470588235 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8823529412 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.35294117647 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 24.0 4.38176352705 548% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162312815101 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.054494994343 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0345349782933 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0448905636909 0.151304729494 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458172595372 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.