Schools are no longer necessary because children can get so much information available through the internet, and they can study just as well at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is recognized that the internet has changed radically the way children acquire knowledge. While many people believe that schools will be redundant and completely replaced by home schooling thanks to broadband connection, I totally disagree with this view.
To begin with, schools play an indispensible role in educating children because of many reasons. The first one is training quality assurance. In fact, when children learn independently through the Internet, it is often difficult to ensure that they will merely focus on lessons instead of indulging themselves with accessing to other entertaining websites. By contrast, learning at school, students will study under the supervision of teachers, who are experienced enough to prevent them from poor academic performances, thanks to giving feedback or imposing discipline. Another reason stems from extra-curricular activities. Specifically, this equips students with many soft skills like cooperation or team-work…, which they cannot acquire by online learning.
Furthermore, it is impossible for the Internet to substitute schools due to several weaknesses. Firstly, there are question marks over its ability to “work” as a trainer. In fact, unlike teachers, who can tailor their teaching styles, online education services can offer only similar curricula to a wide range of scholastic capabilities. This lack of flexibility may make children more likely to find knowledge out of their depths, or even fall behind with their studies. Additionally, an excessive load of materials available on the Internet also has a drawback. Indeed, although this ubiquity makes the studies more convenient, it also requires children to sift information, which is sometimes beyond their capabilities.
In brief, although the Internet is useful, I believe that schools remain the key factor to ensure the success for an education and cannot be substituted by any automatic tools in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-07 | MrDucPhD | 89 | view |
| 2018-09-16 | reecevu2307 | 89 | view |
| 2018-08-22 | phuong cao | 84 | view |
| 2018-08-21 | Longnguyen3001 | 78 | view |
| 2018-06-23 | Deena | 73 | view |
- Some people say that money can make life easier and more comfortable. But others say that having a great amount of wealth can bring some problems. What do you think are the advantages and disadvantages of a having a lot of money? 84
- the only way to improve safety of out roads is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses.To what extent do you agree? 84
- It is more iimportant to learn local history rather than world history To what extent do you agree 78
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Organized tours to remote places and communities is increasingly popular Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and environment 10
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on, I totally disagree with this view. To begin with, schools play an indispens...
^^^
Line 7, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d by any automatic tools in the future.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, so, while, in brief, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1667.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68941979522 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10859867338 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651877133106 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6022390736 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.133333333 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17115132181 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0499196641827 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0325129702479 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0939949055199 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297136659203 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.