It is impossible to help all people in the world, so governments should only focus on people in their own countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that serving the domestic citizens should be the first target of governments. However, from my viewpoint, governments should also support foreign people within their capability.
On the one hand, governments should give priorities to their people because of two reasons. Primarily, the citizens not only elect to establish the governments but also distribute their money to create the national budgets. Therefore, the fundamental purpose of the governments is to improve the living standard of people in their own countries. Secondly, financial budget of each country is limited. Hence, the fund must be spent on solving domestic problems before supporting other countries. For example, the government must invest in military equipment to protect the national securities before helping other countries avoid the war.
On the other hand, governments should also pay attention to people of other countries. The first reason is that by supporting each other, the relationship between countries can be tightened. In the context of globalization, creating strong connections with other countries becomes more important, which can bring about many benefits for countries themselves such as favourable commercial contracts or political cooperation. The second reason is that by sharing the burden with others, the government can avoid potential threats. For example, by helping other less developed countries cure diseases, governments can avoid those diseases to be imported their own countries.
In conclusion, I concur that the government must serve their own citizens first. However, they should ignore people of other countries because supporting others can help to strengthen the relationship between countries and avoid threats to be spread.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-11 | khushboo choudhary | 89 | view |
| 2022-07-18 | trlnanhh | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-10 | YESWANTH KALUVA | 67 | view |
| 2019-02-17 | vannalize | 33 | view |
- The charts show the Australian school leavers did immediately after leaving secondary school. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
- It is impossible to help all people in the world so governments should only focus on people in their own countries To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
- It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history To what extent do you agree or disagree 77
- The charts show the Australian school leavers did immediately after leaving secondary school. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 61
- It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73282442748 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90634256549 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534351145038 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.9883581749 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.133333333 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4666666667 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26666666667 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225076661435 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0948760798034 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774254042697 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16514431367 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416621911262 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.