The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status.
The supplied chart outlines the proportion of leisure hours spent by men and women in a week in 1998-99. The spectacular feature of the chart is the women enjoyed more free time in total as compared to the men.
As is evident in the graph, full-time employed men had 45 hours of leisure times while the females had 7 hours less than the men. However, no data is given for the part-time employed men whereas women of the concerned department had 40 idle hours. In addition, housewives exhausted almost a bit less than the one-third interval of a week, to be precise 50 hours.
It is interesting to note that unemployed, as well as retired males, enjoyed a paramount number of spare hours that was 85% and 83% respectively. Moreover, females of the identical categories relished approximately 78 hours in a week.
To sum up, the graph illustrates that employed individuals had less leisure time to enjoy while the unemployed people had a maximal duration.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | RAYHAN MAHMUD | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | Shivam7090 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | Shivam7090 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | ahmadrava88 | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 73 | view |
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 78
- The graphs show enrolment in different colleges in the Higher Colleges of Technology in 1999. 56
- The chart below shows the number of Apple iPhones sold between June 2007 and December 2010 82
- The charts below show the percentage of monthly household income spent on various items by two different groups in one European country. 95
- To learn effectively, children need to eat a healthy meal at school. How true is this statement? Whose responsibility is it to provide food for school children? 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, third, well, whereas, while, in addition, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 798.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83636363636 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80452212554 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581818181818 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 18.2375813912 43.030603864 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.75 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 5.23603664747 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295730591396 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131364015008 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0987569555972 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178078787963 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106150616245 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.