The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart compares the rate of British donors in several age groups in the years 1990 and 2010.
It is clear that the percentages of those who are from 18 to 50 giving money to charity fell gradually. By contrast, the other age groups saw a slight increase in the rates of people donating.
In 1990, the rate of British donors aged 36-50 was highest, at 42 %. 17 % of the youngest age range donated to charity compared to 31 % for the 26-35 year-olds. The percentage of people of the 51-65 age profile giving money was 35 %, which was 3% higher than that of those over 65.
In 2010, British experienced a gradual drop in the rate of donors of 18-25 age bracket, with 7%, followed by 1990 with 17%. Similarly, there were gradual reductions in the percentages of donors of the 26-36 and 36-50 age range, at 24 % and 35 % respectively. While the level of people of the 51-65 age group making donations rose steadily to just under 40 %, that of those over 65 increased to 35%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-21 | sashwini50 | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-01 | danhvinh126 | 56 | view |
| 2019-06-20 | Mishika sugandhi | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-15 | gizem33 | 67 | view |
| 2019-05-20 | Jasmineeee | 67 | view |
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The charts below show household spending patterns in two countries between 1980 and 2008 80
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The charts below show household spending patterns in two countries between 1980 and 2008. 73
- Some people think that it is good for a country's culture to import foreign movies and TV programmes. Others think that it is better to produce these locally. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
similarly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 797.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.47752808989 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41842211416 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578651685393 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.0996620275 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.5555555556 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.77777777778 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245638212306 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110741830925 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476571045345 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170351984352 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383328580586 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.