Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
A growing number of people believe that pushing up the price of petrol can remain one of the most effective steps to deal with traffic congestions and environmental pollutions. I am totally in favour of this idea. This essay will support my opinion with examples and present two different measures to address the problems as mentioned.
On the one hand, proponents believe that raising the price of petroleum tend to deter the majority of drivers running their vehicles particularly the cars, which actually constitute nearly two-thirds of total automobiles, and also release a large proportion of toxic gases such as carbon dioxide, hydrocarbons in the atmospheres. People are likely to be discouraged secondary to the high prices as this type of change generally dooms people to choose alternative forms of transportations like riding bikes and taking foots. Therefore, this strategy proves how overcrowding of carriers and environmental pollutions may be addressed effectively.
Apart from that, governments should levy taxes and build separate lanes for bikes so that the drivers would be compelled either to use public transportations such as electric trains, buses and so on or bicycles, which typically play crucial roles by decreasing the traffic congestions and its harmful emissions. In addition, overcrowding issues would solve readily if rulers improved infrastructures by building fly overs, bridges and the respective lanes. And recently, an engine efficiency has been steadily improved with upgrade engine designs like placement of a catalytic converter in exhaust pumps of automobiles that would convert very dangerous gases namely nitrous oxide and carbon dioxide to less toxic gases. So, authorities ought to allocate some percentages of national budget to such technology to prevent pristine atmospheres from being contaminated by the exhaust gases.
To conclude, increasing prices, imposing fines and expanding roads make decisive steps to deal with traffic jams and surrounding pollutions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-02 | happyhappy | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | julieehung | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | Chi Hoang | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | Chi Hoang | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-30 | ghikar | 78 | view |
- The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at 90
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 76
- Some people think that the use of animal for experimentation is cruel. Other think it is good for the development of science. Discuss the two sides and give your opinion. 65
- The two charts show the main sources of energy in the USA in 1980 and 1990.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisions where relevant. 79
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirementTo what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 55
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, if, may, second, so, therefore, third, apart from, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1715.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62295081967 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0267214491 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665573770492 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.8151251661 49.4020404114 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.909090909 106.682146367 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7272727273 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90909090909 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0902845460469 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0327598552024 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0294103877688 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0549741075099 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0204671907457 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.83 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.