Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others.
Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped together and taught separately.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer.
Students displaying disruptive behaviors tend to pose a challenge for their more studious peers as well as the teaching staff. While allocating them to different classrooms may provide some temporary relief to both groups, this may not be in the best interest of all students and society.
On one side, by placing disturbing students in the care of a separate teacher, the obedient students are less likely to be negatively affected by the disobedient ones. Hence, cases of bullying or of model students mirroring the pranks of their mischievous classmates would be less frequent. Moreover, teachers have the opportunity to tailor their teaching materials to the abilities and personalities of their classes. In turn, this is more likely to contribute to an effective and efficient learning process for both types of students.
However, by implementing class streaming, schools may be impeding the social skills of their students. Indeed children should learn to cope with the tumultuous traits of others since they are likely to face similar situations as adults.
Furthermore, labeling children as ‘bad’ from a young age may inflict a social stigma which may be hard to discard as they grow up. This may explain why certain schools are infamous for churning out criminals and unproductive workers despite their attempts at employing the most qualified teachers or enrolling well-behaved students. In a sense, the process of grouping students tends to perpetuate inequalities within our society as, over time, students unwillingly conform to the reputation bestowed upon them by adults. In the long run, this system fails to draw the best out of people, especially those considered to be noisy and disobedient.
To conclude, class streaming may not be the best approach to deal with naughty students. Instead, attempts should be made at understanding the circumstances which initially triggered these unpleasant behaviors. Thus, by tackling the problem at its roots, the most ideal outcome can be achieved for all parties involved.
- It is often said that the subjects taught in schools are too academic in orientation and that it would be more useful for children to learn about practical matters such as home management, work and interpersonal skills. To what extent do you agree or disa 93
- Studying the English language in an English speaking country is the best but not the only way to learn language Do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- As the world becomes more technologically advanced, computers are replacing more and more jobs. Describe some job positions that may be lost because of computers, and discuss at least one problem that may result. 66
- We all work or will work in our jobs with many different kinds of people In your opinion what are some important characteristics of a co worker someone you work closely with 73
- Some people think that it is important to have a single language as an international official language Others think that it will make if difficult to identify countries and cause a loss of culture What are your opinions about this 57
Sentence: In the long run, this system fails to draw the best out of people, especially those considered to be noisy and disobedient.
Description: The fragment those considered to is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace considered with verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
flaws:
Sentence Length SD: 4.716 7.5
It is on top list:
http://www.testbig.com/essay-categories/ielts
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 321 350
No. of Characters: 1673 1500
No. of Different Words: 191 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.233 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.212 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.851 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 130 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 109 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 85 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 46 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.4 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.716 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.6 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.321 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.583 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.067 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5