Expenditure on Fast Foods by income Groups, UK 1990.

Essay topics:

Expenditure on Fast Foods by income Groups, UK 1990.

The vertical graph reveals an information about expenditures on three fast food items Hamburger,Fish or Chips and pizza by High income, Average income and Low income groups from Ingland in 1990 year.

It can be clearly seen that most pence were spent on Hamburger compareson other fast food itemsitems.Hamburger were expended more then 40 pence by High income followed by Avarge income and Low income with about 30 pence and near about 20 pence. Moreover Fish and Chips were accounted for 25pence by Average income but more than 15 pence were consumed by Low and High income proportion of masses equaly .

The bar chart highlights the three times more than Low income about 6 pence were invested by High income groupgroup where as 13pence consumed by Average income on Pizza.

To sum up , almost maximum pence were spent on Hamburger however minimum pence were consumed for Pizza in UK 1990.

Votes
Average: 5 (5 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2017-01-06 Sevinch Najmitdinova 56 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Robin :

Comments

Sentence: It can be clearly seen that most pence were spent on Hamburger compareson other fast food itemsitems.Hamburger were expended more then 40 pence by High income followed by Avarge income and Low income with about 30 pence and near about 20 pence.
Error: compareson Suggestion: comparison
Error: itemsitems Suggestion: ?

Sentence: Moreover Fish and Chips were accounted for 25pence by Average income but more than 15 pence were consumed by Low and High income proportion of masses equaly .
Error: equaly Suggestion: equal

Sentence: The bar chart highlights the three times more than Low income about 6 pence were invested by High income groupgroup where as 13pence consumed by Average income on Pizza.
Error: groupgroup Suggestion: No alternate word

flaws:
No. of Words: 152 200

Read a good grammar book.

Always put a space after punctuation marks. E-rater is sensitive.

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 4 2
No. of Sentences: 5 10
No. of Words: 152 200
No. of Characters: 728 1000
No. of Different Words: 85 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.511 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.789 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.255 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 47 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 31 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 20 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 12 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 30.4 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.579 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.6 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.657 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.923 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.318 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4