The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.
The graph below illustrates the proportion of population aged 65 and over for the period of 1940 -2040 in Japan, Sweden and USA.
It can be easily seen that the percentages of people aged 65 and over were closely changing in Sweden and USA, while the percentage in Japan had not reached 5 % during 1940-1996. After 1996, when the curves of Sweden and USA coincided, the difference between them became greater, to be more precise, the number of people aged 65 and over rose steadily and reached 20 %, whereas the percentage was stable in USA during that period.
Meanwhile, the quantity of indicated people began to rise in Japan since 2005, and it is considered that, the indicator of Japan will be maximum among three countries after 2030.
Finally, the major conclusion drawn from this chart is that, although there were fluctuations until 2030, it is anticipated that the proportions will not sharply differ during 2030-2040.
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic problems and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 55
- 1 Some believe that those who are not talented in language learning should not be required to learn a foreign language Do you think school should require students to learn a foreign language 84
- The pie-charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and france in 1980 and 2000. 90
- Modern societies need specialists in certain fields but not others Some people therefore think that governments should pay university fees for students who study subjects that are needed by society Those who choose to study less relevant subjects should n 64
- There are many different types of music in the world.why do we need music? is the traditional music of country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays? 60
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 5 10
No. of Words: 156 200
No. of Characters: 747 1000
No. of Different Words: 93 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.534 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.788 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.504 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 50 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 33 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 23 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 19 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 31.2 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.615 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.6 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.552 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.925 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.241 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4