The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.
The graph below illustrates the proportion of population aged 65 and over for the period of 1940 -2040 in Japan, Sweden and USA.
It can be easily seen that the percentages of people aged 65 and over were closely changing in Sweden and USA, while the percentage in Japan had not reached 5 % during 1940-1996. After 1996, when the curves of Sweden and USA coincided, the difference between them became greater, to be more precise, the number of people aged 65 and over rose steadily and reached 20 %, whereas the percentage was stable in USA during that period.
Meanwhile, the quantity of indicated people began to rise in Japan since 2005, and it is considered that, the indicator of Japan will be maximum among three countries after 2030.
Finally, the major conclusion drawn from this chart is that, although there were fluctuations until 2030, it is anticipated that the proportions will not sharply differ during 2030-2040.
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development? 70
- Failure is proof that the desire was not strong enough.To what extent do you agree with this statement? 70
- The table shows the consumer durables (telephone, refrigerator, etc.) owned in Britain from 1972 to 1983.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 60
- The diagram shows how the Australian Bureau of Meteorology collects up-to-the-minute information on the weather in order to produce reliable forecasts. 70
- Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behaviour. Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 70
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 5 10
No. of Words: 156 200
No. of Characters: 747 1000
No. of Different Words: 93 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.534 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.788 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.504 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 50 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 33 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 23 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 19 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 31.2 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.615 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.6 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.552 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.925 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.241 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4