Claim: Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.
Reason: It is inappropriate—and, perhaps, even cruel—to use public resources to fund the arts when people's basic needs are not being met.
One of the most important responsibilities of every government is paying utmost attention to it people’s demands so it should devote the majority of budget on people’s basic needs. In some societies that the amount of budget is very low, the government should make an effort to provide its people with general welfare instead of spending public resources to fund the arts.
Although the arts play important role to enrich people’s culture and provide them with golden opportunity to express their fleeing, their funding should not be on top priority in some countries that suffered from economical problems. For instance, in African countries that the most proportion of people are very poor and hungry, if their governments devote their budget on rearing artists and building cinema and house opera instead of building reasonable apartments for their citizens, little by little the governments will be outraged. Because the government is expected to take people’s basic demands into account and rescue its people from bad circumstances.
In addition, the government cannot make profits by funding arts at these kinds of countries, because people who are hungry and unemployed prefer spending their time on getting job to doing luxury entertainments like going to opera houses. Therefore, paying attention to the arts and consider them at first level of nation’s goals at poor countries is inappropriate because it is equal to waste time and cost.
Furthermore, there is a wide variety of witness that proves big art projects that were implemented at poor countries failed and even lead to revolution among people. For example, the king of Iran spent the most percentage of the country budget on rebuilding one of historical places of Iran when people suffered from economical problems and paucity. He did not pay attention to people’s basic needs and tried to use public resources on holding big ceremony which was related on Iran’s history. Many Iranian people who were very poor and could not meet their rudimentary needs fight against their kings and made revolution in order to suspending government funding. Because they thought their king’s funding was injustice when they had to struggle with different kinds of economical problems.
In conclusion, taking the arts into consideration as a significant factor in order to devote budget depends on nation’s circumstances. When people would not be able to make a standard living and have to involve with economical problems, their government should consider general welfare of all people and spend the majority of budget on providing people’s demands.
- agree or disagree Teachers should not make their political or social views know to students in classroom 94
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts 90
- Over the past two years the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically Many Central Plaza store owners believe that the decrease in their business is due to the number 73
- Advertising with cable communications crop is a great way to increase your profits. Recently the Adams Car Dealership began advertising with Cable Communications and over the last 30 days, sales are up 15% over the previous month. Let us increase your pro 80
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts. 68
in order to suspending government funding.
in order to suspend government funding.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 416 350
No. of Characters: 2160 1500
No. of Different Words: 205 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.516 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.192 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.694 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 174 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 125 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 84 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 51 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 29.714 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.713 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.377 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.618 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.12 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5