The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.
Given is the table providing information about consumer expenditure on different items in five countries in 2002.
It can be observed that Turkey ranked first with 32,14 % of consumption of foods, drinks and tobacco and was marginally ahead of Ireland, Spain , Italy and Sweden with percentage of 28,91 %, 18,80 %, 16,36 % and 15.77 % respectively. There also was marked difference on consumer spending on clothing and footwear among the given countries precisely, the biggest (9,00%) and the smallest (5,40 %) belongs to Italy and Sweden accordingly.
Referring to the table it also reveals that Turkey lead again with the greatest proportion (4,35 %) of national consumer expenditure on leisure and education. In this occasion Italy and Sweden showed practically the same amount ( around 3,20 %). In comparison with other countries Spain spent minimal quantity on these items, only 1,98 %.
Overall, it can be noted that the percentages fluctuated depending on indicated items and the given countries in 2002.
- The charts below show the results of a survey of adult education. The first chart shows the reasons why adults decide to study. The pie chart shows how people think the costs of adult education should be shared. 53
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 77
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic problems and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 55
- The three pie charts show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 90
- Improvements in health, education andtrade are essential for the developmentof poorer nations. However, the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas. To what extent do you agree or disagree 80
wrong:32,14 %
correct: 32.14%
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 7 10
No. of Words: 153 200
No. of Characters: 812 1000
No. of Different Words: 96 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.517 4.0
Average Word Length: 5.307 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.672 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 56 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 45 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 37 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 25 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.857 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.954 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.429 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.447 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.736 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.042 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4