TPO 16 Integrated writing
The professor explains three arguments opposing the points stated in the reading passage about the serious problems and limitations of performing archaeology activities in the United Kingdom. She asserts that governments set new guidelines in 1990 which facilitate archaeology studies and projects.
First, the professor argues that construction companies have been obliged to examine construction sites based on archaeological interests before start of any project. This brings an opportunity to archaeologists to be available in every construction site and start to excavate, investigate and analyze the site in order to gain valuable artifacts. Therefore, although the reading passage states that many precious artifacts were destroyed in construction projects, this guidelines let archaeologists to be assure about maintaining many of artifacts.
Second, it the reading passage, financial issues have been introduced as one of crucial archaeologists problem in conduction of researches. On the contrary, the professor draws attention to the fact that research costs will be paid by construction companies. This rule can offer an appropriate solution to archaeologists in which they can perform expensive and costly research projects by external sources of money.
Third and last, the reading passage asserts that few job positions are available in archaeology and people consider it as an unpaid amateur and temporary job. In contrast, the professor disproves the idea due to the fact that a lot of paid job positions are exist for archaeologists after guideline has been set. Now, archaeologists should actively participate in construction projects, examine sites, gather and analyze data, write reports and articles and make preserve plans for archaeological interesting places.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-09 | sonyeoso | 90 | view |
| 2020-05-19 | Elhamsarvari | 70 | view |
| 2020-02-25 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 80 | view |
| 2020-02-25 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 80 | view |
| 2019-09-09 | zhrnrz-1992 | 65 | view |
- TPO 27 Integrated 86
- If you could go back to some time and place in the past when and where would you go Why Use specific reasons and details to support your choice 69
- Some people believe that a college or university education should be available to all students. Others believe that higher education should be available only to good students. Discuss these views. Which view do you agree with? Explain why. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 89, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'archaeologists'' or 'archaeologist's'?
Suggestion: archaeologists'; archaeologist's
... have been introduced as one of crucial archaeologists problem in conduction of researches. O...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 111, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as one of crucial archaeologists problem in conduction of researches. On the cont...
^^
Line 7, column 259, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
...ct that a lot of paid job positions are exist for archaeologists after guideline has ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, therefore, third, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 262.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.84732824427 5.08290768461 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24194797564 2.5805825403 126% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587786259542 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2458247921 49.2860985944 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.272727273 110.228320801 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8181818182 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 7.06452816374 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270252325863 0.272083759551 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0997794701664 0.0996497079465 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411140281702 0.0662205650399 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157517373665 0.162205337803 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439557654976 0.0443174109184 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.3589403974 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.8541721854 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.95 12.2367328918 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.42419426049 116% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.