The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in differnt countries in 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisos where relevant.
The charts compares the proportion of water used for agriculture, industry and homes in different parts of the world in the year 2000.
It is clear that agriculture accounted for the largest proportion of water used around the world, in China and India. We can also see that Canada experienced by far the highest water usage in industry sector.
The first pie chart indicates that almost three-quarters of world consumption (70%) was for agriculture, while 22% was used for industry and a mere 8% for domestic sector.
This pattern is almost identical to that for China in 2000, whereas India w...
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-04-10 | Fnweakly | 93 | view |
| 2017-04-10 | Fnweakly | 81 | view |
| 2018-10-30 | Gurpreet sidhu | 67 | view |
| 2020-12-11 | svdcvt | 78 | view |
| 2020-03-02 | Thang Tran | 67 | view |
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language Do you think this is a positive or negative social development 52
- Modern societies need specialists in certain fields, but not in others. Some people therefore think that government should pay university fees for students who study subjects that are needed by society; those who choose to study less relevant subjects sh 78
- The diagrams below show the stages in the development of simple cooking equipment Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisos where relevant 85
- The diagrams below show the development of a small fishing village and its surrounding area into a large European tourist resort Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 85
- Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money This practice can act as an incentive for some but may have a negative impact on others To what extent is this style of management effectiv 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'compare'.
Suggestion: compare
The charts compares the proportion of water used for agricu...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, whereas, while, as for, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 960.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10638297872 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89348012818 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537234042553 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.4522919312 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.375 5.23603664747 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11709781342 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062727056191 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0294500129538 0.0843802449381 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0802290288563 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0200169920766 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.