The maps below show the village of Stokeford in1930 and 2010
The map shows the changes that have taken place at the village of Stokeford during an 80-year period from 1930 to 2010.
It is clear that the biggest change that happened was the number of houses increased dramatically. Additionally, farmland had completely disappeared by 2010.
In 1930, there were a few houses on both sided of the only road which ran through the middle of the village. More streets were built, and housing was extended along the main road in 2010, while the local shops were located in the northeast of the area but it was demolished.
In addition, two areas of farmland to the southeast and northeast of the village were destroyed to make way for residential areas. Meanwhile, the local primary school located opposite the Post office was widened with two blocks. Garden formed the center of the village in 1930 but more houses had been constructed by 2010 on this site and the large house within the grounds was expanded to become a retirement home. The Post Office still remained until 2010.
- The graphs below provide information on global population figures and figures for urban populations in different world regions. 73
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in1930 and 2010 78
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005 67
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the seaside resort of Templeton between 1990 and 2005. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, still, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 843.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81714285714 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45385826978 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617142857143 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.343873362 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6666666667 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18063988152 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735684004654 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0912290163334 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124048062355 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111624030706 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.