Task 1 writing
The bar graph illustrates the changes in estimated number of Asian elephants in both 1997 and 2004. It is immediately apparent that maximum number of Asian elephant was in India while the least number was in China.
To begin with, India had higher number of elephant in 1997, at 10000, the figure dropped by 7500 in 2004. Vietnam and Laos had the similar number of population in both years, at 1000. Malaysia and the Sri Lanka had 3000 elephants in 1997; the figure dramatically fell in Malaysia up to 1000 whereas in the Sri Lanka number of elephants decreased at, 2500.
Furthermore, Myanmar had the just over the 5000 elephants that was the second highest among all countries. Thailand had the 4000 elephant in 1997, the number of the elephant significantly decreased in 2004, at 1000.
In conclusion, the trend was downward overall. India remained number one on list while the despite of the size, China had very small population at most 500 elephant by 2004.
- Some say that children should spend more time working on school projects from an early age others believe that young children should spend more time playing and have less stress at school Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Some people say that computer skill should be added to primary school subject in elementary school such as reading writing and math do you agree or disagree 61
- The advantages and disadvantages of computers and TV for the mental development of children 74
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- Writing Task 1 60
Sentence: Furthermore, Myanmar had the just over the 5000 elephants that was the second highest among all countries.
Description: The fragment the just over is rare
while the despite of the size,
while despite of the size,
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 10
No. of Words: 166 200
No. of Characters: 775 1000
No. of Different Words: 84 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.589 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.669 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.487 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 49 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 37 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 27 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 16 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.444 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.909 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.456 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.703 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.103 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4