The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket.
The map compares two potential locations for a new supermarket in a town of Garlsdon.
It is clear from the map that the first site (S1) is outside the town, whereas the second site (S2) is in the town center.
According to the map, S1 is in the countryside, which lies 12 kilometers to the northwest of the town. This site is close to local residents of Garlsdon and Hindon. Meanwhile, S2 is surrounded by the industrial area and the housing zone.
In addition, there are three roads which connect to the surrounding town, Hindon, Bransdon and Cransdon. However, the central area is a no traffic area, so parking would be a problem in S2. By contrast, S1 lies on the main road to Hindon, but it would be difficult to reach Bransdon and Cransdon. Main transport system for both supermarket sites is railway which links between Hindon and Cransdon.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-30 | morbymuku | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | habeeb omran | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | andrew123 | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-16 | mirandajose | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-13 | David Shahi | 84 | view |
- The flowchart below shows the process involved in completing the work experience requirement for university students. 73
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at Queen Mary Hospital since its construction in 1960 78
- The charts below show the results of a survey about what people of different age groups say makes them most happy. 67
- The charts below show the results of a survey about what people of different age groups say makes them most happy. 67
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 22, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the town center. According to the map, S1 is in the countryside, which lies 12 ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 699.0 965.302439024 72% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67805070071 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586666666667 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 197.1 283.868780488 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 17.2311804659 43.030603864 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.6666666667 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337203407156 0.215688989381 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14371494192 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.171138433464 0.0843802449381 203% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266654797832 0.15604864568 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.182793159338 0.0819641961636 223% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.45 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.