Children today play very violent games. This must be the reason for the increase in violence and crime in most major cities of the world.
What are your opinions on this?
Nowadays most children regularly play games on a computer or their television. These games have become more violent over the past few years. In fact, many parents worry about this and the effect these games are having on their children. Some are concerned that playing violent games might encourage them to come aggressively in real life. What we need to establish is whether or not this is actually true.
First, it may help to look back at the games that children used to play many years ago before the invention of computers. In those days children would probably have played popular board games such as Monopoly or Chess, or they may have played card games or some type of outdoor sport. These sports or games would probably only have encouraged children to become more competitive rather than violent.
However, throughout history children have always played fighting games with a toy or pretend weapons. Even now many parents will buy a toy gun or sword for their child. Why do we never read reports in the media about the impact plastic weapons could have on children? Perhaps this is because the link between play fighting and actual fighting is not very strong.
In conclusion, the way children play games have changed with the times but the ideas behind those games have actually changed very little. Just as playing at soldiers did not increase violence in the past, I believe that playing computer games will not lead to an increase in violence in the future. I think that if we looked more closely at life in our major cities then we would find there are many other possible causes for the increase in crime and violence.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-09-28 | RSudhir | 48 | view |
| 2017-09-27 | RSudhir | 84 | view |
| 2017-05-18 | Moushumi Shema | 78 | view |
| 2017-05-18 | Moushumi Shema | 61 | view |
| 2017-05-18 | Moushumi Shema | 56 | view |
- Prevention is better than cure. Researching and treating diseases is too costly so it would be better to invest in preventative measures. To what Extant do you agree? 73
- Prevention is better than cure Researching and treating diseases is too costly so it would be better to invest in preventative measures To what Extant do you agree 82
- Scientist and technology experts seem to be more valued by modern society than musicians and artist. To what extent do you agree. 96
- 4.We live in a world of technology these days. While the internet brings with it clear advantages, the problems in terms of control and security of information outweigh the advantages. To what extent do you agree? 40
- Your neighbours have recently written to you to complain about the noise from your house flat.Write a letter to your neighbours. In your letter explain the reasons for the noise and apologise.Describe what action you will take. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 369, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...real life. What we need to establish is whether or not this is actually true. First, it may h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, look, may, so, then, i think, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1356.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77464788732 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23429296791 2.80592935109 80% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570422535211 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.384769539078 520% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5066162621 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21400041041 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796310771511 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383387520753 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138860245983 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414812608778 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.