TPO 32
In the reading passage, the author claims that there are three viable hypothesizes regarding the source of quackers, which is a weird sound head by the sailors in Russian submarines. However, finding all the ideas implausible and questionable, the professor casts doubt on what is presented in the text and states in spite of the fact that the principal reason for emitting such this peculiar phenomenon is still a contentious issue, there are serious problems concerning the mentioned theories.
At first, the author argues that the quackers are in fact the orca whales sounds which are in counter ship ritual. Conversely, the lecturer contend the idea that this assumption is entirely unlikely. Having lived on the surface of ocean, orcas' sound could not have been detected by the Russian submarines moved deep in ocean. Moreover, if orcas had been the cause, the sonar would have been able to detect them, but they could not identify them nonetheless.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that giant squid would have produced this bizarre sound. On the other hand, the professor dismisses this idea by clarifying the fact that indeed, the presence of this giant marine invertebrates was ratified in 1960 for two decades. The problem is the sound vanished suddenly, while the squids were still living in that region. Therefore, if the source of quckers was the squid, it would have been continued thereafter.
Finally, the author asserts that the sound is related to another submarine attributing to different country equipped with technology that had made it undetected. The professor, thought, disputes this point by subscribing the point that the origin of the sound not only moved around the Russian submarine but also altered its direction so rapidly. Furthermore, the engine of the submarine produces noticeable sound. Subsequently, this theory is unconvincing as well since the submarine that is capable to move with such fast pace with silent engine has not been invented yet.
- is wining the most important aspect of playing a game? 80
- Integrated 31: The evidences which approved Sinasauropteryx was feathered dianosaure 86
- What do you want most in a friend – someone who is intelligent, or someone who has a sense of humor, or someone who is reliable? Which one of these characteristics is most important to you? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your choice. 76
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads TO what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- dinosaurs were endotherm 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, regarding, so, still, therefore, well, while, in addition, in fact, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1680.0 1373.03311258 122% => OK
No of words: 324.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18518518519 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64204742027 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 145.348785872 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574074074074 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 419.366225166 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0401226392 49.2860985944 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.2857142857 7.06452816374 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357482986713 0.272083759551 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121611087663 0.0996497079465 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763301776542 0.0662205650399 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195611497575 0.162205337803 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0873454820253 0.0443174109184 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 63.6247240618 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.7273730684 177% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.