Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth and resources among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizen themselves?
The gap between poor and rich nations has been evident throughout the history of our world. It has been a mission of the wealthier nations to aid their struggling counterparts especially with food and education. Personally, I somewhat favor the help that developing countries get but their respective governments should play an integral and major parts in alleviating its citizens condition.
To begin with, countries like the United States and Japan play the big brother role for the past half century. In the Philippines, for example, these two countries have supported the Philippine government financially to solve the two main problems encountered by a common Filipino, food and education. Financial grants had been given countless times to construct more school buildings and provide a more decent educational materials for school children. Similarly, investments were made in order for the Philippines to be self- sufficient in terms of food. Huge amounts of money are donated for the research and development of the country's staple food, rice. However, it is my personal opinion that the government of the Philippines should make a conscious effort to not to rely too much from foreign aids. The Philippines and other developing countries should have contingency plans in case those Foreign aids stop coming. These countries can start by lessening or stopping corruption in the government, thus, the money goes to where it should. If the funds are properly allocated and accounted more poor nations can be self- sufficient, in terms of food and education.
In conclusion, it is the moral obligation of wealthy countries to share their blessings. However, steps are needed for developing countries in order to have long term sufficiency, for the food and education of its own citizens.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-25 | ahmadrava88 | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-27 | Akten | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-27 | Akten | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-09 | Jazz 12344 | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-11 | Bholo | 73 | view |
- The chart below give information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 63
- Some people work for the same organization all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organizations.Discuss both these views and give your opinion. 67
- Your local hospital has advertised for people to help to do unpaid work helping at the hospital. You would like to do some work at the hospital in your free time.Write a letter to the hospital. In your letterExplain why you would like to do unpaid work at 56
- Some people believe that children should be allowed to stay at home and play until they are six or seven years old Others believe that it is important for young children to go to school as soon as possible What do you think are the advantages of attending 60
- The first chart below shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross section of 100 000 people asking if they travelled abroad and why they travelled for the period 1994 98 The second chart shows their destinations over the same period Write a report 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 678, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...ys staple food, rice. However, it is my personal opinion that the government of the Philippines ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'termed'.
Suggestion: termed
...eloping countries in order to have long term sufficiency, for the food and education...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, similarly, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29020979021 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91567512353 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597902097902 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7692657564 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.071428571 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180608585999 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651531070307 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501030995261 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137101989171 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483962829939 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.