Nowadays many parents believe that children’s usage of tablets or computers would be good for their future academic career. What are the advantages and disadvantages of such belief? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.
The shocking phenomenon of changing educational pattern recently comes to forefront. Some feel that modern techniques will not have an effect on future academic career. However, I agree with those who say that new techniques will help children’s in enlighten their bright future. In the following paragraphs, I will explore the rationale for both beliefs as well as proffer rationale for a viewpoint on this matter.
Regarding those who feel that new technique will not help; there exists valid reason the main justification is that with new technique there is less supervision of teachers. The Alaska reported just last week that students of Alaska who studied with the help of modern techniques they acquire bit less percentage as what they usually score.
Nevertheless, I can’t hold the opinion in good conscience because individuals who used new techniques of study not only cater their study material at a short span of time; instead they come up with new automation in to the society for their betterment. The Harvard reported those Austrian citizens who take early initiative, an estimated 100,000 not only scored better grades, are now more mature. That same Harvard report mentioned that initiative of Austrian citizen proved that study through this new method foster process of children’s future academic career.
In sum, if everyone put a moratorium on a belief that only teaching through traditional methods helps student in the future academic career and pitches in, normal people like others and I can bring change. I hope that soon everyone understands how modern equipment like computers and modern tablets help the student.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-26 | Farwah | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-26 | Tolik | 89 | view |
| 2019-03-30 | Vaman Randhawa | 61 | view |
| 2018-07-09 | ilets1478963 | 67 | view |
| 2018-01-30 | chitra | 84 | view |
- It is important to construct common areas such as parks playgrounds and squares in all towns and cities Do you agree or disagree 61
- Nowadays many parents believe that children’s usage of tablets or computers would be good for their future academic career. What are the advantages and disadvantages of such belief? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from you 78
- Many companies invest their money in sport games for advertisement purposes. Some people think it is good for the sport world, while others believe that it has some disadvantages. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- Many companies invest their money in sport games for advertisement purposes. Some people think it is good for the sport world, while others believe that it has some disadvantages. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 362, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... explore the rationale for both beliefs as well as proffer rationale for a viewpoint on th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 341, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... percentage as what they usually score. Nevertheless, I can't hold the opin...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1399.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31939163498 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7752382608 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604562737643 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0764704483 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.181818182 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9090909091 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142538621895 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559244194724 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394595375123 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0861144348508 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416764720693 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.