Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
In any country, there are plentiful problems occurring. The author claim that government urge to work more on solving the problems occurring now rather than trying to solve the future problem that will happen. I concede with this claim, the government needs to find out what is the problem of people and then try to solve that problem. I agree with this issue to some extent, trying to solve a problem that will occur in future like global warming also very beneficial.
Firstly, It is well known that today is the best time to start any work. The government should undoubtedly focus on a current issue. Likewise, give 24hrs electricity to every home in rural areas. Nowadays, in many countries unemployment rate is drastically increase, therefore, the government should create a new policy so many companies/factories attract to set up their manufacturing plant. Consequently, an unemployment rate will diminish.
Moreover, the government has to fulfill services in rural areas as they give in urban areas. For instance, In urban areas, there are many banks, hospitals, schools, colleges, and universities. This type of services are basic needs for every people, therefore, the government tries to provide all necessary needs in rural areas rather than wasting money in researches that will be or will not be help in future.
In addition, Challenges like illiteracy need to be taken care of immediate along with long-term planning. It is necessary to make an adult must be aware of the importance of education. The Government needs to take certain steps like free education, scholarships so those who can’t afford tuition fees can also study and accomplish their dreams. Hereafter, they can save him and their family.
However, also need to focus on a long-term problem like global warming is a critical issue for the world. If we don’t do anything now the outcomes will be more dangerous in a couple of years. At that time problems are too big to fix on short time which leads to fatal disasters. The government needs to take some step to prevent this problem.
In sum, the statement at some point is right like create plenty of jobs, give electricity, provide necessary needs. Nevertheless, it overlooks many long-term issues, particularly global warming, who leads major problems in forthcoming years.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-19 | jason123 | 50 | view |
2020-01-18 | Himanshu Sharma | 66 | view |
2019-12-30 | PFF TAHSAN | 50 | view |
2019-12-26 | tg763622253 | 58 | view |
2019-12-06 | sudesh tiwari | 58 | view |
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. 58
- "Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central Plaza store owners believe that the decrease in their business is due to the numb 60
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 50
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
- Some People believe that Robots play an important role in future societies, While other argue that robots might have negative effects on societies give often. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 215, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
... home in rural areas. Nowadays, in many countries unemployment rate is drastically increa...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 401, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...arches that will be or will not be help in future. In addition, Challenges like illit...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, likewise, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, well, as to, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1953.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 380.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13947368421 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85365465243 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542105263158 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.5915435468 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.7727272727 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2727272727 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72727272727 5.21951772744 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329836492392 0.243740707755 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861255841536 0.0831039109588 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107794977324 0.0758088955206 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140895028712 0.150359130593 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133333300685 0.0667264976115 200% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.