TPO 21
The author of the passage believes that genetically modified trees bring about several merits to us. The lecturer, however, has the opposite point of view. She explains why the author is not right about his points.
First, the author states that genetically modified trees are more enduring, and therefore, their survival rates are higher than those of normal trees. On the contrary, the lecturer argues that while among natural trees there are always few individuals who survive any given condition, genetically modified trees may not survive an unidentified condition, providing that they are all similar to each other.
Second, the author asserts that since genetically modified trees grow faster, and yield more products, they are more efficient economically. On the other hand, the lecturer postulates that not only genetically modified tree seeds are more expensive, but it is also obligatory to pay the seed producer company every time you want to plant new seeds produced by your own trees.
Finally, the author suggests that planting genetically modified trees help preserve endangered natural trees. In contrast, the lecturer contends that genetically modified trees compete with natural trees in the area in which they grow. Since these trees use resource more aggressively, they deplete all resources. As a result, natural trees are endangered by genetically modified trees.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at a young age.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO 23 88
- TPO 24 78
- TPO-29 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO 17 Integrated 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, while, in contrast, as a result, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1181.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 215.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49302325581 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63333048084 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586046511628 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 375.3 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.8860038475 49.2860985944 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.363636364 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5454545455 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2727272727 7.06452816374 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.489213043339 0.272083759551 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.220160344546 0.0996497079465 221% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126863766168 0.0662205650399 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.306087538703 0.162205337803 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113987873222 0.0443174109184 257% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.8541721854 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.2367328918 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.