The bar chart below shows the percentage of people using various form of transport in France
The given chart gives information about the proportion of French people consuming four different means of transport from 1990 to 2010.
It is clear that there were different decreases in almost figures, except for car. Moreover, bus was the most popular means of transport in 1990, but after 20 years, car was the most attractive one in 2010.
In 1990, the percentages of residents using bus and car in France stood at around 70% and 50 % respectively. In addition, while France witnessed a dramatic decline to around 28% in the proportion of people who consume bus, that of car reached a peak of more than 90% over the period of 20 years.
Over 60% was the figure for individuals commuting train in Frace, while that of bicycle only stood at nearly 45% at the beginning of the period shown. Throughout 20 years, there were moderately fall by about 7% and 15% in the percentages of commuters using train and bicycle respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-15 | Jasmineeee | 61 | view |
| 2020-04-25 | Thang Tran | 11 | view |
- Many people blame increasing crime rates for violent television programs. Others believe means of media offer many helpful ways to raise public awareness. Discuss both views state your opinion. 78
- Some animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in the sea. What are the reason? What solution to solve them? 73
- Most large companies nowadays operate multinationally. To what extent they have responsibility toward local communities? Should their enterprises offer help to their employees and local citizens? 84
- More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a short time doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses for communities in poorer countries What are the reasons for this Who benefits more from this the communities or these young 79
- Some people think that good health is very important to every person, so medical service should not be run by profit-making companies. Do the advantages of private health care outweigh the disadvantages. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, while, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 779.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83850931677 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66724530759 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583850931677 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2931257778 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.285714286 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140434579623 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665175769552 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540681928323 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0848262658223 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466068482346 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.