tpo integrated 26
The lecture and the reading both discuss the invasion of the zebra mussels. The reading states that the invasion of the zebra mussels cause a serious threat to the fish population in all North America, The invasion is hard to control, and enumerates three reasons of support. However, the lecture refutes. It claims that there are many methods to control the invasion of the zebra mussels.
First of all, the reading argues that the invasion of the zebra mussels is unstoppable, because it caused by human activity. Moreover ships responsible for spreading out the mussels. The lecture disagrees. It claims that in the past people had not enough knowledge to control the spread of the mussels. According to the professor, today people are able to control the mussel’s invasion by requiring the ships to empty the ballast water near the ocean, which caused the mussels to be killed by the salt water. .
In addition, the reading claims once the zebra muscles are carried to any habitat can dominate it. For example, first when the mussels are moved to the North American ocean, the mussels have no habitat there. However the lecture opposes this point by saying that in the beginning there will be no predator, but after that the local aquatic birds will know that there is new kind of food. The birds would eat a lot of the mussels. Consequently the mussel’s population will decline.
Lastly, the reading makes an argument that the zebra mussels compete with many fish for there food. However, the lecture disagrees. It claims that it is true that the zebra compete has a negative impact on the some fish population. But, there are other kinds of fish the get positive impact from the zebra mussel’s invasion, such as the bottom fish, which increase in number because of the zebra mussels.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-15 | Salu | 70 | view |
| 2020-06-08 | maya14 | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | lucasantunes | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-24 | fateme ozggoli | 85 | view |
| 2019-03-05 | ilda | 85 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 126, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...e, because it caused by human activity. Moreover ships responsible for spreading out the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 515, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...mussels to be killed by the salt water. . In addition, the reading clai...
^
Line 10, column 210, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ean, the mussels have no habitat there. However the lecture opposes this point by sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 431, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Consequently,
...e birds would eat a lot of the mussels. Consequently the mussel's population will decli...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 211, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...ra compete has a negative impact on the some fish population. But, there are other k...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, lastly, moreover, so, for example, in addition, kind of, such as, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 306.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98366013072 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45930280209 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470588235294 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 462.6 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.1207298428 49.2860985944 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.7222222222 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94444444444 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.423456645115 0.272083759551 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12469567539 0.0996497079465 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874524064203 0.0662205650399 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262245001139 0.162205337803 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0215622740261 0.0443174109184 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.