Some people support the development in agriculture such as factory farming and scientific creation of new types of fruits and vegetables. Others oppose this view and support other developments. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Recent decades have witnessed the increase in the capital investments in agriculture sectors, raising many questions of the necessity. Although the advantages of these innovations could be pronounced, disbursements on other sectors would offer more benefits.
On the one hand, there are a multitude of advantages when ít comes to the agricultural development. First, the invention of many modern machines is invariably associated with the increase in harvest output. In fact, the application of irrigation and harvest technologies of Israel culminated in the five-fold rise in Vietnamese agricultural output in 2000, solving the perpetual crisis of food shortages. Second, The development of genetically-modified food living in harsh droughts and degrade soil has extricated many individuals living in developing countries from the cycle of famine and poverty, promoting the betterment in their overall living standards.
On the other hand, It should be acknowledged that disbursements on the developments of other public sectors would bestow net positive benefits. First, the Higher degree of capital investments in the development of transportation vehicles should be encouraged. For example, spending on electric cars would reduce the dependency on gas-driven cars, which are proved to be the main source of carbon dioxide and methane concentrations in the environment. In addition, The injection of funds on medical research would feed into the possibilities of finding new treatment methods or inventing new vaccines against many lethal diseases such as cancers or diabetes, lengthening citizens’ overall life expectancy.
In conclusion, More financial support should be poured on other innovations such as transportation vehicles and medical research. The official authorities should allocate national budgets appropriately for the long-term sustainability of the citizens overall.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-30 | Kamaldeep | 84 | view |
| 2017-07-26 | grahamoneil | 78 | view |
- It is more important for a building to serve a purpose than to look beautiful Architects shouldn t worry about producing building as a work of art Do you agree or disagree 63
- Some people do not go directly to college but travel or work for a short time. Do you think it has more advantages or disadvantages? 11
- Advertising encourages customers to buy in quantity not in quality. To what extent you agree or disagree. 67
- The graph below shows the change in proportion of GDP in three areas in a particular country between 2000 and 2020 100
- There are many different types of music in the world today Why do we need music Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, then, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.97802197802 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40681002895 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604395604396 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.879514517 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.0 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116170800462 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0408911830326 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419451328342 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0683156382824 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216465768343 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.7 12.4159519038 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.8 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.