The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car, bus or train between 1970 and 2030.
The line graph illustrates the average number of UK worker traveling by three different transport from 1970 to 2030.
Overall, the car is by far the most popular of types of transport of the majority of the 60-year period. And there is a gradual decline of the people who use the bus.
In 1970, around 5 million UK commuters used a car to travel to work each day, whereas the number of workers chose the train and the bus below 3 million and about 4 million, respectively. Up to 2000, there was a strong increase driver rose to 6 million. Passengers used the train also slightly went up exactly 3 million. On the contrary, the number of workers catching a bus was slowly fell approximately 0.5 million.
In 2030, commuters who travelled by car wil be expected to quickly rise to 9 million. roughly 6 million passengers are predicted to use the train. In contrast, there is a continuous decrease in the figure for traveler chose the bus below 3 million.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-04 | rosevu05 | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-25 | phadode | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-27 | nguyendynamo | 73 | view |
| 2020-07-12 | vannhi0501 | 67 | view |
| 2023-04-03 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
- As a result of electronic inventions such as the computer and television, people do less physical activity and this is having a negative effect on their health. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Average annual expenditure on cell phone and residential phone service 2001 2010 63
- Essay topics In the past most people lived in small villages where everyone knew everyone else Nowadays most people live in large cities where they only knew a few people in their area What do you think were the advantages and the disadvantages of living 78
- expenditure 61
- Modern forms of communication such as email and messaging have reduced the amount of time people spend seeing their friends This has had a negative effect on their our social lives To what extent do you agree or disagree 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 87, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Roughly
... expected to quickly rise to 9 million. roughly 6 million passengers are predicted to u...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, whereas, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 791.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62573099415 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67348057325 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573099415205 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.127551813 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.1 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350971627762 0.215688989381 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126562151259 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115291895794 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205279523318 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0885006519886 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.