Average annual expenditure on cell phone and residential phone service, 2001-2010
The line graph compares yearly cost between mobile and landline phone services over a period of 10 years.
Overall, in the UK, the fee for using cell phone quickly rises while expenditure on residential phone service gradually drops throughout the period shown.
In the year 2001, around 700 dollars the spending on mobile according to consumer expenditure survey while the expenses of landline phone to be paid by UK people only about 200 dollars.
The trends for two types of phone service completely exchange. As can see been from the graph, the expenditure on two services became evenly in 2006, with figures roughly 550 dollars each year. By 2010, the amount of money spent on mobile phone services successively increase, approximately 750 dollars. On the other hand, only over 400 dollars the cost of residential phone services in the same year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-31 | trpg143 | 78 | view |
| 2024-07-24 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-26 | meoconxinhxan | 70 | view |
| 2024-03-09 | lalo | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | chau hoang | 72 | view |
- Average annual expenditure on cell phone and residential phone service 2001 2010 63
- In the past most people lived in small villages where everyone knew everyone else Nowadays most people live in large cities where they only knew a few people in their area What do you think were the advantages and the disadvantages of living in small comm 74
- Modern forms of communication such as email and messaging have reduced the amount of time people spend seeing their friends This has had a negative effect on their our social lives To what extent do you agree or disagree 86
- expenditure 61
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 716.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 141.0 196.424390244 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0780141844 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.44591672665 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55011635142 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.624113475177 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 219.6 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2624448462 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.285714286 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286561725889 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138648032636 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724274140184 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17764830314 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0739832991634 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.