Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In the age of modern information technology, having access to accurate news about unfolding events unfolding has become increasingly important. As a whole, life is moving at a quicker pace probably than any other time in history and this is in large part due to the unhindered flow of information. Though some might believe other wise, In my opinion, it is comparatively more appropriate if one is able to be informed through various news outlets. I hold this view for two main reasons which I will explore in this essay.
To begin with, Not all the resources or venues that are in the business of broadcasting news can always be trusted. The authors some time might have a hidden agenda or in the best case scenario not well-informed about the events. Moreover, there is always the possibility of rumors or fake information be taken seriously if the source of the news is not valid. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. Around a year ago when a giant sky scraper fell apart in the city where I live because of spreading fire, I recall that everyone had a different account of what had actually happened. Some would say that around a hundred people died while others would tell you that the building had not collapsed at all. This was mostly so since lots of the news about this tragic occurrence was coming from unverified internet sources, which have gained massive popularity where I live. Of course, that leads to a great deal of confusion and it took days before the official explanation of what had happened came out.
Secondly, some pieces of news are related to a specific field or expertise thus, are not covered extensively. Normal news outlets such as newspapers or websites often times intend to highlight events that are appealing to the general public. Consequently, they might not allocate enough time or effort to cover such developments as thoroughly as possible. For instance, a major scientific breakthrough in physics which has helped to explain the cause of a previously unknown phenomenon, may not have a long lasting attraction to ordinary individuals who have little interest in what implications this discovery can have. On the other hand, experts, professors, students or any other person who is involved in academic matters related to physics is certainly willing to be deeply informed about multifarious aspects of this event. Therefore it seems reasonable for this group of people to get relevant information from sources who share the same interest and have adequate knowledge about the mentioned finding.
In sum, I hold the view that it is better if one tries to expand the range of sources where he/she reads news from. Not only will it prevent any possible confusion, but also it is helpful if you want to get specific information about a certain subject.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children(five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities.Use 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 326, Rule ID: OTHER_WISE_OTHERWISE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'otherwise'?
Suggestion: otherwise
... information. Though some might believe other wise, In my opinion, it is comparatively mor...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... which I will explore in this essay. To begin with, Not all the resources or ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion of what had happened came out. Secondly, some pieces of news are relate...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 232, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...hlight events that are appealing to the general public. Consequently, they might not allocate ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 836, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...out multifarious aspects of this event. Therefore it seems reasonable for this group of p...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...owledge about the mentioned finding. In sum, I hold the view that it is bette...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, of course, such as, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2342.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 476.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92016806723 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75114487214 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 272.0 212.727598566 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 754.2 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9745483579 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.1 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35 5.45110844103 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153713956701 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479802126184 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344587535212 0.0737576698707 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.097749787684 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0206434647721 0.0645574589148 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 86.8835125448 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.