Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The industrial revolution had a great impact on people`s lives in many aspects containing people`s careers. Before, people used to have individual jobs and usually did not work for another person or company. However, people now are mostly working for companies or factories and thus, they have to come up with a fixed schedule. They are usually two schedules available for people based on the hours they work each day. They can either work five days a week for shorter hours or work only three days a week for long hours. I personally go for the latter schedule since I contend that it is not only more enjoyable, but also more efficient. I am going to elaborate on my opinion in the following paragraphs.
First of all, a three-day job will give one a more flexible program and one will be able to do many extracurricular activities besides his salient job. For instance, one can play some sports, takes a trip and even simply meets with his family in/on his free days and he does not have to worry about his job. It has been proved that people who experience a five-day job are less likely to spend their weekends for entertainment and they tend to just sleep during their vacations instead of some social enjoyable activities. Consequently, their vulnerability to mental diseases such as depression increases greatly.
The second equally important point is that working for three days a week, no matter how many hours one works a day, will give him a sense of freedom and he will not get exhausted of his job any time soon and he will have much greater yield than who works for five days. An experiment was conducted on two groups of workers of the same company, whose difference was the number of days they worked, showed that the ones with less day works(!) a week had much more interest and efficiency compared to the others who worked for five days a week. So the lower the number of days one works, the more efficient he will be.
Last but not the least, working for long hours not only is not a disadvantage but also is a great chance to get focused and productive. It goes without saying that it is better to do a job completely in one try rather than dividing it to many shorter parts. If one wants to do his job in short hours, especially for time-taking jobs, he has to leave his job incomplete until the next day and start it again. It is axiomatic that this procedure will decrease the efficiency by a great amount. In spite of this, one will be able to finish each of his tasks in one day by working for long hours and only quits his job when he makes sure the job is completely done.
To wrap it up, I contend that working for three days a week is far better than working for five days since it makes people not only physically, but also mentally more efficient. I suggest people reconsider their work schedule and make it more convenient by reducing the number of days and increasing the work hours each day. However, the schedule should match the person`s preferences and one can say that he is more comfortable with a five-day schedule.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 439, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: A
...owed that the ones with less day works! a week had much more interest and efficie...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, however, if, second, so, thus, as to, for instance, in short, such as, first of all, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2526.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 554.0 407.700716846 136% => OK
Chars per words: 4.559566787 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.85151570047 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54981006423 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469314079422 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 794.7 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.2213857964 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.818181818 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1818181818 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22727272727 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.408290863609 0.236089414692 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139890514249 0.076458572812 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103014846912 0.0737576698707 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26591733326 0.150856017488 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546297591853 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.