Some People believe that Robots play an important role in future societies, While other argue that robots might have negative effects on societies give often.
Currently, use of the technology is increasing in every field. It is common in every field. Human uses its day-to-day life. Technology reduces men’s effort and it saves time that is very helpful for any human. Nowadays, robots are used in industries, residential area, transportation etc. Robots impact on society might be good or bad. Every technology has its pros and cons. According to me, robots are very helpful for people.
Firstly, robots can work more precisely than human. Furthermore, robots save time and increase safety. For example, to clean the house or office, after configuring robot it works automatically and cleans the house. Hence, it saves time and convenient for the human.
Moreover, in huge industries, the artificially intelligent robot is used. They can think like a human. To illustrate, artificially intelligent robot generate output as input received that means, if that robot gets some unwanted task and do not aware of how to complete this task, therefore, it think and give appropriate output. This evolution will change human life.
Although, these robots have a negative impact like it take human jobs. Therefore, the unemployment rate will increase. Furthermore, people rely more and more on robots so, it will indirectly effect on human health. In addition, robot maintenance is very huge. Hence, it also affects financially to people.
In conclusion, for industrial purpose, robots are very helpful and efficient. In addition, it also uses in the home. Nevertheless, every coin has two sides, in this case, robots take job of human and it indirectly affects financial and human health.
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. 58
- In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should be required to step down after five years.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing a 12
- Pie Chart for source of energy 66
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 50
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 382, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
...Every technology has its pros and cons. According to me, robots are very helpful for people. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 295, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'thinks'?
Suggestion: thinks
...ow to complete this task, therefore, it think and give appropriate output. This evolu...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...is evolution will change human life. Although, these robots have a negative impact li...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 192, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[7]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...d more on robots so, it will indirectly effect on human health. In addition, robot mai...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1382.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31538461538 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85296482348 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553846153846 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 10.0 20.2975951904 49% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0532070385 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 57.5833333333 106.682146367 54% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 10.8333333333 20.7667163134 52% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 3.4128256513 352% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193546238472 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055394371806 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580136564314 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114594588609 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338750945238 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.0946893788 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.87 50.2224549098 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.39 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 4.0 9.78957915832 41% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.0 10.1190380762 59% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.