The consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat.
The line graph illustrates changes in terms of the amount of fish and three different kinds of meat which people in a European country over a period of 25 years.
Overall, fish was the least popularly used food in the European country from 1979 to 2004. While there were upward trends in the consumption of beef, lamb, and fish, the figure for chicken saw a considerable increase.
As is shown by the graph, nearly 220 grams per person per week of beef was consumed in 1979. Although this figure fluctuated, it remained almost higher than the other kinds of food in the first decade with around 200 grams in 1989, then fell dramatically to just over 100 grams in 2004. Likewise, the country saw a significant decrease regarding the consumption of lamb, fell from 150 grams in 1979 to about 60 grams in 2004. The consumption of fish had a smaller change, starting at about 60 grams in 1979 and went down to reach a low of under 50 grams in 2004.
By contrast, the amount of chicken which was consumed began at under 150 grams in 1979, making it lower than that of beef and lamb. However, throughout the period shown, the figure rose considerably, peaked at roughly 250 grams in 2004.
- the pie charts show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010 87
- what are the advantages and disadvantages for children of TV 52
- the graph below gives info about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007. 67
- This chart shows the top eight destination for newlywed British couples in 2010 The results come from a survey of 5000 couples 70
- the graph shows the oil production capacity in 6 countries between 1990 and 2010. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, likewise, regarding, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56807511737 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42726182996 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544600938967 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2105553528 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.111111111 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160549222146 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695518421646 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749008200859 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115136688499 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.088752413301 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.97 61.2550243902 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.5 10.3012195122 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.