Not so many people use a bicycle although it has many benefits. Why? How to encourage people to use bicycles as a main transport?
Recent years witnessed the upwards spectrum in gas-driven vehicle users, raising many questions of bicycles’ significance despite their advantages. Given that this pattern could be attributed to many reasons, official authorities’ initiatives could reverse it.
There are many reasons for citizens’ indifference to bicycles. First, Bikes are invariably associated with low speed and excessive demand for physical strength, costing unnecessary time and effort when it comes to moving from one location to another from a far distance. Second, Some nations could not invest any capital budget into the installation of public infrastructure serving the needs of bike users such as highways for cyclers. This would lead to bikers’ transgression onto roads for other vehicles, increasing the possibilities of fatal accidents.
However, governments should undertake many initiatives to combat this issue. First, governments are highly-recommended to raise the tariff on cars or car components for manufacturing in the local market. This would make the car prices beyond the reach of many individuals with limited incomes and exclusively within the affordability of those with high purchasing power, forcing people to resort to cheaper alternatives especially bicycles. In addition, Official authorities should organize campaigns to raise citizens’ awareness of automobile dependency’s environmental impacts, thereby culminating in the rise in bike users and the decline in other gas-powered vehicles.
In conclusion, citizens’ preference for other vehicles rather than bicycles could stem from the excessive requirement of physical strength of bikes and the lack of public cycle infrastructure. However, official authorities should reverse this pattern by either increasing the import duty on cars or conducting campaigns in favour of bike usage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-25 | hghann | 78 | view |
| 2022-02-28 | minhlamnguyen1204 | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-31 | fachryadul92 | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-31 | fachryadul92 | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-31 | fachryadul92 | 56 | view |
- Some people say that it is impossible for a country to br both economically successful and have a clean environment. Others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 92
- Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of the old houses in the local areas Others think that people should have freedom to build houses of their own style Discuss and give opinion 81
- Some people support the development in agriculture such as factory farming and scientificcreation of new types of fruits and vegetables. Others oppose this view and support otherdevelopments. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- Advantage and disadvantage of playing virtual games on teenagers 95
- Some people think international cooperation has brought benefits to world environmental protection while others believe more benefits have been brought to international business Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.09022556391 5.12529762239 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41801071072 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639097744361 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5588367422 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.0 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0902963446497 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0377718012471 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406318456103 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0597164482755 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034793614427 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 50.2224549098 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.04 12.4159519038 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.96 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.